SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 769

DINESH KUMAR PALIWAL
Aaditya – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sandeep Jain, Advocate, Kamlesh Tamrakar, Advocate
Final Result : Allowed

JUDGMENT

Dinesh Kumar Paliwal, J. - This second bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed on behalf of the applicant for grant of bail pending the trial.

2. His first bail application was dismissed as withdrawn and not pressed with liberty to renew the prayer for bail after evidence of witnesses of seizure memo vide order dated 10.02.2023 passed in M.Cr.C. No.57211/2022.

3. The applicant is in custody since 13.09.2022 in connection with Crime No.391/2022, registered at P.S.-Mundi, District - Khandwa (M.P.) for the offence punishable under Sections 8/20, 29 of NDPS Act.

4. As per the prosecution story on 13.09.2022, 5 kg contraband Ganja (Cannabis) was seized from the joint possession of Vikram Thakur and Aaditya Thakur and since then they are in custody.

5. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant has not committed any offence. He is innocent. He has falsely been implicated in this case. No contraband was seized from his possession. Applicant is Labour. He has no criminal background. Even the witnesses of seizure memo and other panchnamas prepared by police have not supported the seizure of contraband from the possession of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top