SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 814

NANDITA DUBEY
Sudhir Pandey – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Harsha Pandey, Advocate, Aatmaram Bain, Advocate
Final Result : Allowed

JUDGMENT

Nandita Dubey, J. - Advocate for the applicant is abstaining from the Court work today.

2. This is the first application filed by the applicant under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. for grant of bail.

3. The applicant is in custody since 13.2.2023 in connection with Crime No.116/2022 registered at Police Station Kolar Road, District Bhopal for the offence punishable under Section 306 of IPC.

4. As per prosecution, deceased Bhupendra Tiwari committed suicide leaving a suicide note behind wherein he has stated that present applicant has taken an amount of Rs.18 lakhs and some gold jewellary and has been blackmailing him since long. He has further stated that present applicant is also asking for Rs.50 lakhs of further amount, hence he is committing suicide.

5. The statements of wife of the deceased and other persons have been recorded, however there is no clarification as to how the blackmailing was done.

6. Smt. Harsha Pandey, wife of present applicant, who has appeared on behalf of the applicant, has referred to Annexure A-2, which shows that the challan of Rs.10,000/- was issued against the deceased for drunk driving. She admitted that the deceased has taken the scooty of the present

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top