IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Vishal Dhagat, J.
Nayagaon Cooperative Housing Society Jabalpur – Appellant
Versus
The State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Writ Petition No. 2609 of 2023
Decided On : 17-03-2023
Jurisdiction - Cooperative Society - Dispute Resolution - The court held that the Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies had the jurisdiction to deal with the issue of allotment of plot and execution of sale deed, as it constituted a dispute touching upon the business of the society, which falls within the scope of Section 64 of the M.P. Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner challenged the order of the Deputy Registrar Cooperative Society directing the petitioner-society to execute a registered sale-deed in favor of Respondent No.4 for a non-existing plot.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the Deputy Registrar had the jurisdiction to deal with the issue of allotment of plot and execution of sale deed, and directed the petitioner to approach the appellate authority in accordance with the law.
Issues: The issues involved the jurisdiction of the Deputy Registrar to pass the order of allotment and execution of sale deed, and the availability of the plot for allotment.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the dispute between the petitioner and the cooperative society constituted a dispute touching upon the business of the society, falling within the scope of Section 64 of the M.P. Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.
Final Decision: The writ petition was disposed off with a direction for the petitioner to approach the appellate authority in accordance with the law, and the stay of the award was granted for a period of 30 days.
ORDER
Vishal Dhagat, J. - Petitioner has filed this petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India challenging order dated 29.12.2022 contained in Annexure-P/1 passed by Deputy Registrar Cooperative Society, Jabalpur.
2. By impugned order, direction was given to petitioner-society to execute registered sale-deed in favour of Respondent No.4 at a particular rate in respect of a non-existing plot. Order of Dy. Registrar Cooperative Society is challenged on the grounds that Dy. Registrar does not have any jurisdiction to pass order of allotment of plot and execution of sale-deed. Direction of High Court to decide representation of respondent does not give any jurisdiction to Dy. Registrar. Petitioner raised preliminary objection that representation preferred by Respondent No.4 is not 'dispute' within the meaning of Section 64(2) of Madhya Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. Dy. Registrar failed to answer said objection. Learned Dy. Registrar failed to consider the entitlement of Respondent No.4 for allotment of plot. Allotment of plot and execution of sale deed is to be done by society and Registrar cannot order same. Plot No.147 was not available with society as same was never approved by TNCP. There is noncompliance of Section 72(1)(B). It is submitted that Court cannot sit over commercial wisdom of cooperative society and dictate rates at which plot is to be sold. In view of aforesaid submission, learned Senior Counsel appearing for petitioner prayed for allowing the writ petition and quashing of order of Dy. Registrar.
3. Respondents opposed writ petition on the ground that cooperative societies are not covered under Article 12, therefore, writ petition is not maintainable. Reliance is placed on 1993(1) MPLJ 767. It is submitted that plot No.147 was allotted to respondent in 2009 at rate of Rs.150/- per square feet and necessary payment was also made by Respondent No.4 but petitioner deferred allotment of plot on flimsy grounds. If there is any dispute regarding interpretation of any matter then Registrar is final authority, therefore, order does not suffer from defect of jurisdiction. It is submitted that complicated question of facts is involved between petitioner and private respondent No.4, which cannot be adjudicated in writ petition. Petitioner is having an alternate remedy to prefer an appeal. On the basis of said submissions, prayer is made for dismissal of writ petition.
4. Deputy Registrar Co-operative Societies directed that member be allotted Plot No. 147 as per current rate i.e. Rs. 150 per Sq. Ft. and registered sale deed be executed and possession be given to respondent No.4.
5. Heard the counsel for the parties.
6. Petitioner had contended that Plot No. 147 is not available with society as same has not been approved by Department of Town and Country Planning. Lay out of 102 acres of first phase of society as on 06.04.1984 is filed as Annexure P/5. On going through said lay out plan, last plot which is available in Phase 1 is Plot No. 146. Society intended to carve out fresh plots for its member but same could not be done as they were exceeding 54.148 acres and therefore, TNCP did not approve the same. Remaining lands reserved in Phase 2 and Phase 3 have been taken back by the State Government. In view of aforesaid, respondent had not denied availability of Plot No. 147 as averred by petitioner, therefore, it will be presumed that Plot No. 147 is not available at present with petitioner.
7. Disputes in M.P. Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 is defined in Section 64. As per said definition, any dispute touching constitution, management or business or liquidation of society shall be referred to Registrar by any of the parties to dispute. Society in question is cooperative housing society which allots plots for residential purposes. Allotment of plot touches upon the business of society. Society's only work is to develop the area and to make available plots to its members on payment of cost. In view of same, the
The main legal point established is that the Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies has the jurisdiction to deal with disputes touching upon the business of the society, as per Section 64 of the M....
The Registrar's authority to refer disputes to the District Judge under section 48(8) of the Bihar Co-operative Societies Act, 1935, and the requirement to set aside a registered sale deed through a ....
Authority under Section 70 enables the Additional Registrar to cancel improper allotments and registered sale deeds within cooperative societies, reinforcing adherence to bylaws and judicial oversigh....
An appeal against a Deputy Registrar's order to the Registrar is not maintainable under the MP Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.
The main legal point established is that the Registrar of the Co-operative Society does not have jurisdiction to annul a sale deed, and the Civil Court has the authority to declare the sale deed as n....
The Registrar under the Rajasthan Co-operative Societies Act 2001 cannot adjudicate title disputes, which must be resolved by a Civil Court.
The Deputy Registrar lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate membership and ownership disputes under Section 154B-27 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, which only allows for enforcement of existi....
Section 9 of Code of Civil Procedure, Civil Court is vested jurisdiction to adjudicate all suits of civil nature. Exclusion of jurisdiction of Civil Court to adjudicate suit of civil nature is an exc....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.