SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 759

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT GWALIOR
Deepak Kumar Agarwal, J.
Dheeraj Singh Meena & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. – Respondents
Criminal Appeal No. 3261 of 2023
Decided On : 02-03-2023

Advocates Appeared:
Murari Lal Yadav, Advocate, B.M. Shrivastava, Advocate
Final Result : Disposed Of

The court's decision emphasized the importance of cooperation in the trial and adherence to the conditions of anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Cr.P.C.

Headnote:

Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act - Anticipatory Bail - The court allowed the appeal under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. and directed that in the event of arrest, appellants be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond.

Fact of the Case:

The appellants filed an appeal against the rejection of their application for anticipatory bail in connection with a case registered under various sections of the IPC and the SC/ST Act. The prosecution alleged that the appellants had obstructed the police and abused them in connection with a separate incident.

Finding of the Court:

The court allowed the appeal and directed that the appellants be released on bail upon arrest, with the condition that they cooperate in the trial and abide by the conditions of Section 438 of Cr.P.C.

Issues: The main issue was the grant of anticipatory bail to the appellants in a case involving allegations under the SC/ST Act and other sections of the IPC.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the facts and circumstances of the case and decided to allow the appeal, emphasizing the need for the appellants to cooperate in the trial and abide by the conditions of anticipatory bail.

Final Decision: The appeal was allowed, and the appellants were directed to be released on bail upon arrest, subject to the specified conditions.

JUDGMENT

Deepak Kumar Agarwal, J. - The appellants have filed this appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the order dated 21.02.2023 passed by Special Judge,(Atrocities) Guna, whereby, application of appellants preferred under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. has been rejected.

2. The appellants are apprehending their arrest in connection with Crime No.358/2022 registered at Police Station Kumbhraj, District Guna (M.P.) for the offence punishable under Sections 353, 186, 294, 342, 149 of IPC and Sections 3(1)(da), 3(1)(dha), 3(2)(va) of SC/ST Act.

3. As per prosecution story, on 21.12.2022 complainant Sub-Inspector Ajeet Kujur had gone for a notice to the accused house of bearing Crime No.222/2022, Section 13 of Gambling Act, in which accused Mahendra Meena was apprehending. When accused Meena saw the complainant and police force, Mahendra abused them and locked himself in a room. Thereafter, family members of the accused Mahendra Meena who are the present appellants had stopped the complainant and police force to enter in the room and also abused them in filthy languages. On this aforesaid incident, offence was registered against them.

4. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the appellants are innocent and have falsely been implicated. They have not committed any offence. No case under the SC/ST Act is made out against the appellants and other offences registered under the IPC are bailable. It is further submitted that the appellants are the reputed citizens of the society and if they are sent to jail then their social reputation would get diminished. Hence, appellants prayed to allow this appeal and grant of benefit of anticipatory bail to the appellants.

5. Learned Public Prosecutor for the State vehemently opposed the appeal and prayed for its rejection.

6. Heard learned counsel for the parties at length and considered the arguments advanced by them and perused the record.

7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting on merits of the case, the appeal is allowed. It is directed that in the event of arrest, appellants be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand Only) each with one solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Arresting Authority/Investigating Officer.

8. The appellants shall cooperate in the trial and shall regularly appeal before the trial Court as and when required. They shall further abide by the other conditions enumerated in sub-section (2) of Section 438 of Cr.P.C.

9. With aforesaid directions, the present appeal stands disposed of.

10. Certified copy/ e-copy as per rules/directions.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top