SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 458

VIVEK AGARWAL
Krishna Kumar Pandey – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Vijay Kumar Shukla, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. None for the petitioner.

2. Nobody had appeared for the petitioner on 26/2/2018 and 6/3/2018 also. Today also, nobody appeared for the petitioner.

3. This petition is filed by the petitioner claiming compassionate appointment on the death of father of the petitioner, who was working as Assistant Teacher in the Government Primary School, Bhitari, Sankul Government Higher Secondary School, Kandhwar, District Sidhi, where while working he died on 8/6/2009.

4. Petitioner's contention is that he had applied for compassionate appointment on the post of Peon in the Vikas Khand Rampur Naikin, District Sidhi.

5. Now petitioner's grievance is that since petitioner is Higher Secondary pass, therefore, he should be given appointment on a Class III post like Ward Boy, Patwari, Registration Clerk, etc. in terms of the circular of General Administration Department dtd. 18/8/2008.

6. Law in this regard is well settled that there cannot be an endless compassion. Once petitioner accepted appointment on compassionate basis on a Class IV post then, he cannot seek upgradation of his appointment after accepting appointment on a Class IV post and, therefore, in the light of the judgment of Hon

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top