SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 573

S. A. DHARMADHIKARI
Shivam Nichrele – Appellant
Versus
The State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Navnidhi Parharya for petitioner; G.K. Agrawal, Government Advocate for respondents/State.

ORDER

1. This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India being aggrieved by the action on the part of the respondents, whereby petitioner's application for appointment on the post of Class-3 on compassionate basis has been rejected.

2. The brief facts leading to filing of this case are that father of the petitioner was an employee of the respondents/department and was posted as Class-4 employee in Nagar Palika, Datia. The father, namely; Pradeep Nichrele expired on 1.12.2019 while in service. After his death, the petitioner applied for compassionate appointment on a suitable post. The educational qualification of the petitioner is B.Sc. Looking to the qualification, he was hopeful that he would get appointment on the post of Class-3. However, vide order dt.11.5.2020, the petitioner was appointed on the post of Peon, which is a Class-4 post. The petitioner joined the services under protest. Thereafter, the petitioner filed an application for reconsideration or upgrading his post from Class-4 to Class-3. The aforesaid application was rejected vide order dt. 7.7.2020 relying on clause 13.1 of the policy dt. 29.9.2014.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner subm

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top