SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(MP) 56

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
Vishal Dhagat, J.
Bharat Singh Kushwaha S/o Shri Radheshyam Kushwaha - Applicant
Versus
The State of Madhya Pradesh Through Police Station Raisen – Respondent
Misc. Criminal case No. 57771 of 2023
Decided On : 23-01-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Applicant :Shri Sankalp Kochar, Advocate
For the Respondent:Shri S. K. Rai, Govt. Advocate

Bail applications should not be decided on the merits of the case, and the evidence adduced in trial should be weighed by the trial court.

Headnote:

Bail Application - Criminal Law - The court dismissed the bail application after considering the arguments from both parties and emphasizing that bail applications should not be decided on the merits of the case. The court highlighted that the evidence adduced in trial should be weighed by the trial court, and the High Court will not appreciate evidence adduced in trial.

Fact of the Case:

The applicant filed a bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. in connection with a case involving multiple offenses under the Indian Penal Code. The applicant was alleged to have been armed with a lathi and involved in causing injuries to the victim.

Finding of the Court:

The court dismissed the bail application as withdrawn, considering the arguments from both parties and emphasizing that bail applications should not be decided on the merits of the case.

Issues: The main issue was whether the applicant should be granted bail, considering the allegations and arguments presented by both the applicant and the State.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that bail applications should not be decided on the merits of the case and that the evidence adduced in trial should be weighed by the trial court. The court also highlighted the importance of the prosecution's recorded statement of eye witnesses under Section 161 of Cr.P.C.

Final Decision: The bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

ORDER :

1. This is a repeat (third) application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. on behalf of applicant, who is in jail since 24.4.2023 in connection with Crime No. 153/2023, registered at Police Station Kotwali District Raisen for the offence punishable under Sections 307, 294, 323, 324, 506, 34 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submitted that as per prosecution story applicant was armed with lathi. 12 injuries is said to have been caused to the victim and except one injury all other injuries are incised wound. One injury is a lacerated wound skin deep and that injury could not have been caused by a lathi. Applicant has been falsely implicated in the case as there was previous enmity and complainant has been convicted in another case. In these circumstances, applicant may be enlarged on bail.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the State has opposed the bail application and submitted applicant along with other co-accused persons participated in the offence. He was also armed with a lathi. Lacerated wound could have caused by the applicant or other co-accused persons. At present there is eye witness account that applicant was present and he participated in the offence. It is further submitted that as per deposition, 7 witnesses have supported the prosecution case before the trial Court. Reference was also give to deposition sheet. Applicant is also having four criminal records. In these circumstances, prayer is made for dismissal of the bail application.

4. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

5. Merit of the case means when both parties are heard and evidence of both parties is weighed by Court i.e. examination-in-chief, cross-examination and documentary evidence. Once order is passed on merits of the case then trial Court as well as parties are bound by the findings in order and no contrary finding can be given by trial Court. To save a party from prejudice, it is a rule that bail applications shall not be decided on merits of the case. High Court will not appreciate evidence adduced in trial and same is work of trial Court. Discussing evidence of prosecution will not amount to decide case on its merits. In these circumstances, deposition filed in Court is not considered.

6. Prosecution recorded statement of eye witnesses under Section 161 of Cr.P.C., which will have edge over opinion of doctor and inconsistency will not be of much value.

7. Counsel for the applicant at this stage of arguments prays for withdrawal of the application.

8. Prayer is allowed.

9. Bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top