SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 913

HIRDESH
New India Assurance Company Limited (The) – Appellant
Versus
Punam Chandra Maheshwari @ Bablu – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Pranay Gupta for petitioner; R. P. Mishra for respondent No. 1.

ORDER

1. Though this matter was listed for admission, however, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties it is heard finally.

2. This appeal has been filed by the appellant/Insurance Company under section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, being aggrieved by the award dated 16.3.2021 passed by the Additional Member of District Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jaisingh Nagar, District Shahdol in MACC No.32/2016 on account of reduction/exoneration from the liability.

3. Brief facts of the case are that on 25.7.2015 at 6:20 pm respondent No. 1 (Punran Chandra Kesharwani @ Bablu) was driving motor cycle bearing registration No. MP-18 MC-8862. The respondent No. 2 (Arjun Yadav) came from opposite side, driving his Motor Cycle No. MP-18 MH-0442, in a rash and negligent manner and dashed against the claimant's motor cycle, causing him serious injury on his thigh. The left femur bone of claimant got fractured and the disability of permanent nature has been caused. The claimant filed the claim petition for compensation under section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act before the Tribunal and prayed for grant of compensation to the tune of Rs.45,70,000/-.

4. Police registered the case against respondent

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top