SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(MP) 102

SUBODH ABHYANKAR
Anshul – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Trilok Chand Jain for petitioners; Nisha Jaiswal, Government Advocate for respondent No. 1/State; Rishiraj Trivedi for respondent No. 2.

ORDER

1. Heard finally, with the consent of the parties.

2. This petition (M.Cr.C. No.6308 of 2022) has been filed by the petitioners under section 482 of Cr.P.C., for quashing the FIR lodged at Crime No.999 of 2018 registered at Police Station – Vijay Nagar, Indore under sections 498A, 323, 506, 34, 325 and 313 of IPC and also the subsequent proceedings which are pending in S.T. No.578 of 2019 in the Court of 16th Additional Sessions Judge, Indore.

3. Since charges have already been framed in the aforesaid case, the petitioners, by way of extra precaution, have also filed a separate Criminal Revision No.3272 of 2022 against the framing of charges dated 18.7.2022 and 4.8.2022 under sections 498A and 313 of IPC against all the petitioners, and additional charges against petitioner No.1 under sections 323, 325 and 506 of IPC and since the facts are identical, the aforesaid criminal revision is also being disposed of vide this order.

4. The case of the petitioners is that the petitioner No.1 Anshul Gupta’s marriage was solemnized with the respondent No.2 Smt. Purnima on 23.4.2000, whereas the petitioners No.2 and 3 are the octogenarian father and mother of the petitioner No.1. Out of t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top