SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(MP) 92

SANJAY DWIVEDI
Sumit Baghel – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K. C. Ghildiyal with Kapil Sharma for petitioners; Girish Kekre, Government Advocate for respondent/State.

ORDER

1. Since pleadings are complete and learned counsel for the parties are ready to argue the matter finally, therefore, at their joint request, it is heard finally.

2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners are calling in question the legality, validity and propriety of order dated 2.8.2021 (Annexure-P/1) passed by respondent No.5 whereby the authority invoking the power provided under Article 311(2)(b) of the Constitution of India had dismissed the petitioners from service; order dated 24.9.2021 (Annexure-P/7) passed in the appeal preferred by the petitioners against the order dated 2.8.2021 whereunder the appellate authority affirming the order of petitioners’ dismissal had rejected the appeal and also the order dated 10.5.2021 (Annexure-P/9) whereby the mercy appeal preferred by the petitioners got rejected.

3. The brief facts as to comprehend the disputes are that at the relevant point of time, the petitioners being the constables were posted at Police Station Ayodhya Nagar, Bhopal. On 10.7.2021 at about 09:00 pm, while the petitioners were on patrolling, they found two suspicious boys near gates No.4 and 5 of Minal Res

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top