SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(MP) 204

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Vivek Agarwal, J.
Tribal Welfare Teachers Association President D. K. Singore
& Another v. State of M.P. & Others
Writ Petitions No. 10444 of 2020, 1998 of 2021 and 3407 of 2022 (Jabalpur); Decided on 1.3.2024

Advocates:
K.C. Ghildiyal with Aditya Veer Singh for petitioners;
Amit Mishra, Panel Lawyer for respondents/State.

Headnote:

Panchayat Raj Evam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993 (M.P.) -- Ss. 51 and 52(4) -- M.P. Panchayat Shiksha Karmis (Recruitment and Conditions of Services) Rules, 1997 -- R. 2(h) -- M. P. Panchayat Adhyapak Samvarg (Employment and Conditions of Services) Rules, 2008 -- R. 2(f), 2(g) and 2(h) -- M. P. Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976 -- R. 2(e) -- Constitution of India -- Arts. 243G and 243I -- Fundamental Rules -- Rr. 2 and 3 -- petitioners initially appointed as Shiksha Karmi/Samvida Shala Shikshak -- later on absorbed in cadre of Adhyapak w.e.f. 1.4.2007 -- applicability of Pension Rules of 1976 -- nowhere do Rules of 1997 provide for constituting service under State Government -- petitioners appointed on contract under Rules of 1997 and thereafter under M. P. Panchayat Samvida Shala Shikshak (Appointment and Conditions of Contract) Rules, 2001 (now repealed) -- they are not covered by Pension Rules of 1976 -- plain reading of Art. 243G makes it abundantly clear that mere delegation of certain powers and authority to enable them to function as institutions of self-government will not take away autonomy of Panchayat Raj institutions -- since their identity is not merged with that of State Government, their employees cannot seek to get their identity merged with State Government to seek benefit of pension -- Shiksha Karmi or Samvida Shala Shikshak or Adhyapak Samvarg is category of persons meant for teaching in schools under control of Zila Panchayat or Janpad Panchayat -- they are not under control of State Government -- by no stretch of imagination can they be said to be civil servants in terms of definition given in Fundamental Rules 2 & 3 -- they not being civil servants, Pension Rules of 1976 will not be applicable to them -- their claim for grant of pension under Rules of 1976 cannot be accepted. (1983) 2 SCC 33 distinguished. Writ Petition No. 2634 of 2020 decided on 3.10.2023 (Indore) referred to. [Paras 18 to 20, 25 to 29]

iapk;r jkt ,oa xzke Lojkt vf/kfu;e] 1993 ¼eŒçŒ½ & /kkjk 51 rFkk 52¼4½ & eŒçŒ iapk;r f'k{kk dehZ ¼HkrhZ rFkk lsok dh 'krsZ½ fu;e] 1997 & fuŒ 2¼t½ & eŒçŒ iapk;r v/;kid laoxZ ¼fu;kstu rFkk lsok dh 'krsZ½ fu;e] 2008 & fuŒ 2¼p½] 2¼N½ rFkk 2¼t½ & eŒçŒ flfoy lsok ¼isU'ku½ fu;e] 1976 -- fuŒ 2¼³½ & Hkkjr dk lafo/kku & vuqPNsn 243N rFkk 243> & ewy fu;e & fuŒ 2 rFkk 3 & ;kphx.k vkjaHk esa f'k{kk dehZ lafonk 'kkyk f'k{kd fu;qä & ckn esa 1-4-2007 ls vè;kid ds laoxZ esa vkesfyr & lu~ 1976 ds isU'ku fu;e ykxw gksuk & lu~ 1997 ds fu;eksa esa dgha Hkh jkT; ljdkj ds v/khu lsok xfBr djus dk mica/k ugha & ;kphx.k lu~ 1997 ds fu;eksa ds v/khu lafonk ij fu;qä rFkk rRi'pkr~ eŒçŒ iapk;r lafonk 'kkyk f'k{kd ¼fu;qfä rFkk lafonk dh 'krsZ½ fu;e] 2001 ¼vc fujflr½ ds v/khu & og lu~ 1976 ds isU'ku fu;eksa ls vkPNkfnr ugha & vuqPNsn 243N ds iBu ek= ls foiqyrk ls Li"V gks tkrk gS fd Lok;Ùk 'kklu dh laLFkkvksa ds :i esa dk;Z djus esa leFkZ cukus ds fy, dfri; 'kfä;ksa vkSj çkf/kdkj ds çR;k;kstu ek= ls iapk;r jkt laLFkkvksa dh Lok;Ùkrk ugha fNusxh & mudh igpku dk foy; jkT; ljdkj esa ugha gksrk blfy, muds deZpkjh isU'ku ds Qk;ns dh bZIlk ds fy, viuh igpku dk foy; jkT; ljdkj esa djkus dh bZIlk ugha dj ldrs & f'k{kk dehZ ;k lafonk 'kkyk f'k{kd ;k v/;kid laoxZ ftyk iapk;r ;k tuin iapk;r ds fu;a=.kk/khu fo|ky;ksa esa f'k{k.k ds fy, vk'kf;r O;fä;ksa dk çoxZ gS & og jkT; ljdkj ds fu;a=.kk/khu ugha & dYiuk dh fdlh Hkh mM+ku ls mUgsa ewy fu;e 2 ,oa 3 esa nh xbZ ifjHkk"kk ds vuqlkj flfoy lsod ugha dgk tk ldrk & flfoy lsod ugha gksus ds dkj.k lu~ 1976 ds isU'ku fu;e mUgsa ykxw ugha gksaxs & lu~ 1976 ds fu;eksa ds v/khu isU'ku çnku fd, tkus dk mudk nkok Lohdkj ugha fd;k tk ldrkA ¼1983½ 2 ,llhlh 33 çHksfnrA fjV ;kfpdk Øekad 2634 lu~ 2020 fu.khZr fnukad 3-10-2023 ¼bankSj½ fufnZ"VA ¼iSjk 18 ls 20] 25 ls 29½

ORDER

1. These bunch of petitions raises a common issue that petitioners who were initially appointed as Shiksha Karmi/Samvida Shala Shikshak, who were later on absorbed in the cadre of Adhyapak w.e.f. 1.4.2007, have become Government servants with formation of Rajya Shaikshnik Samvarg in the year 2018, which has three tier system of Prathmik Shikshak i.e. Primary Teacher, Madhyamik Shikshak i.e. Middle Teacher and Uchcha Madhyamik Shikshak i.e. Higher Secondary School Teacher.

2. It is submitted that since petitioners have become Government servants, they are entitled to the benefit of the Madhya Pradesh Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976, which was applicable to all the employees of the State Government, who were appointed prior to 1.4.2005. It is submitted that since petitioners were appointed prior to 1.4.2005, therefore, on their merger with the State Government, they are entitled to the Old Pension Scheme.

3. Writ Petition No.10444/2020, Tribal Welfare Teachers Association v. State of Madhya Pradesh is taken as lead case and all the documents referred to herein, will be the documents from this petition.

4. Shri K.C. Ghildiyal, learned Senior Advocate, submits that Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Shiksha Karmis (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1997, were framed by the State Government in the year 1997. Some of the petitioners were appointed under those Rules and some others under the Samvida Shala Shikshak (Appointment and Conditions of Contract) Rules, 2001.

5. It is submitted that thereafter Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Adhyapak Samvarg (Employment and Conditions of Services) Rules, 2008, were brought into force as are contained in Annx.P/5, and there was a Scheme that Shiksha Karmi Grade-III, will be absorbed as Sahayak Adhyapak, Shiksha Karmi Grade-II as Adhyapak and Shiksha Karmi Grade-I as Varishth Adhyapak. Analogous provisions were made with regard to the Rules of 2001. Thereafter, in the year 2018, Rajya Shaikshanik Samvarg has been prepared and came in force and now there is a common cadre, namely, Rajya Shaikshanik Samvarg.

6. Petitioner's contention is that after becoming part of Rajya Shaikshanik Samvarg, they are entitled to be treated retrospectively from the date of their initial appointent to be members of the State Civil Service entitling them to the benefits as are admissible to the civil servants under the Madhya Pradesh Civil Services (Pension) Rules of 1976 and to support this submission, reliance is placed on section 51 of Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Rajya Avam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as Act of 1993 for short).

7. Reading from section 51 of the Act of 1993, it is submitted that the State Government has been given authority to entrust to a Janpad Panchayat or Zila Panchayat functions in relation to any matter in which the executive authority of the State Government extends or in respect of functions which have been entrusted to the State governmnt by the Central Government and the Janpad Panchayat or Zila Panchayat shall be bound to perform such functions. It shall have necessary powers to perform such functions.

8. Reading Sub-section (2) of section 51 of the Act of 1993, it is pointed out that since the functions which are entrusted to a Janpad Panchayat or Zila Panchayat under Sub-section (1), the concerned Zila Panchayat or Janpad Panchayat has to act as an agent of the State Government and they are to be paid by the State Government such sum as may be deemed necessary for discharging the functions entrusted to it under this section. Therefore, in view of the provisions contained in sub-section (4) of section 52 of the Act of 1993, where, there is a provision for general control of the State Government or any other authority appointed by it, it is submitted that de facto petitioners have been employees of the State Government and, therefore, they are entitled to count for all the benefits which accrued to a civil servant under the State.

9. In this backdrop, petiti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top