Punjab HC Acquits Ram Rahim in Journalist Murder
07 Mar 2026
Appellate Courts Can Rely on Unexhibited Public Documents Produced by Plaintiff: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC
07 Mar 2026
Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
Right to Promotion is Legitimate Expectation; Marriage-Based Transfer Can't Defeat It: Himachal Pradesh High Court
12 Mar 2026
Non-Compliance on Counter Affidavits Draws Exemplary Costs Warning: Supreme Court in Gauri Maulekhi PIL
13 Mar 2026
SLPs Challenging PoP Idol Immersion Orders Disposed as Infructuous; Liberty to Assist Bombay HC: Supreme Court
13 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
G. S. AHLUWALIA
Mohit Sadana – Appellant
Versus
Vijay Kumar Goyal – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
ORDER
1. This civil revision has been filed against the order dated 21.2.2024 passed by Second Civil Judge, Junior Division, Shivpuri in RCSA No.120/2022, by which application filed by petitioner under Order 7 rule 11, CPC for rejection of plaint has been dismissed.
2. Facts necessary for disposal of present revision, in short, are that respondent filed a suit for eviction from the suit shop. The petitioner filed an application under Order 7 rule 11, CPC on the ground that since trade and business is being carried out by petitioner from the suit premises, therefore in view of section 2(1)(c)(vii) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 (for short “the Act”), jurisdiction of civil Court is barred and thus the civil Court should have rejected the plaint on the ground of lack of jurisdiction. To buttress his contention, counsel for petitioner has relied upon judgment passed by Calcutta High Court in the case of Maharshi Commerce Limited v. Rajiv R. Balani & Ors. decided on 10.11.2022 in CS/3/2019 (IA No. GA/6/2022).
3. Per contra, revision is vehemently opposed by counsel for the respondent. It is submit
The central legal point established in the judgment is the strict construction of the provisions of the Commercial Courts Act, the requirement to consider the nature of the proposed amendment before ....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of the definition of 'commercial dispute' under the Commercial Courts Act and its application to the nature of the dispute be....
A dispute arising from an agreement to sell immovable property used for trade is a commercial dispute, mandating resolution in a Commercial Court, as clarified by statutory definitions.
The interpretation of the term 'used' in the context of commercial disputes under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 is crucial in determining the jurisdiction of the Commercial Court.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article