SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(MP) 193

ANIL VERMA
Umesh Kaithwas – Appellant
Versus
Rajendra Borasi – Respondent


Advocates:
Abhinav Malhotra for petitioner; Shubham Dholpure for respondents.

ORDER

1. Heard on IA No.4416/2024, which is an application for taking documents on record.

2. Documents may be relevant for proper adjudication of this petition, therefore, IA is allowed and the documents are taken on record.

3. This miscellaneous petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the petitioner being aggrieved by the impugned order dated 19.12.2023 passed in MJC GW/1/2023 by the District Judge, Badnagar, District Ujjain.

4. Brief facts of the case are that petitioner and his wife (Late Chanchal Kaithwas) belongs to the Hindu Religion and their marriage was solemnized on 23.5.2019 at Badnagar as per the Hindu rites and rituals and after the marriage they blessed with a son Nirbhay who has been born on 5.12.2021. Now he is about 2 years old. Unfortunately on 26.11.2022 petitioner’s wife Chanchal has been died.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that now the minor child Nirbhay is living with the respondents who are maternal grandfather & maternal grand-mother of Nirbhay. Petitioner being the natural guardian wishes to have the custody of his child to ensure his wellbeing, health, education and lifestyle, which is very crucial for h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top