SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 1949

ARCHANA PURI
Rahul – Appellant
Versus
Shalini – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Pankaj Mahavir Chauhan, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. G.C.Shahpuri, Advocate, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Archana Puri, J. - Challenge in the present revision petition is to the order dated 04.05.2022 passed by learned Addl. Principal Judge, Family Court, thereby, allowing the application filed by the respondent qua interim custody of the minor son of the parties to the lis.

2. Initially, respondent-Shalini had filed the petition under Section 6 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956, thereby, seeking custody of the minor son, namely Viraj, from the petitioner-husband Rahul.

3. Therein, an application for seeking interim custody was filed by respondent-Shalini.

4. The facts, as culled out, from the pleadings of the parties, are that petitioner-Rahul and respondent-Shalini (as making appearance in the present petition) got married on 05.02.2018 and from their wedlock, a son, namely Viraj, was born on 06.03.2020. Although, there are allegations and counter allegations about bad behaviour and conduct of both the petitioner as well as the respondent, as spelt out from the pleadings, but it also reflects that parties are residing separate, since December 2020.

5. Thereupon, the petition under Section 6 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act was filed by Shalini against her

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top