(BOARD OF REVENUE)
Shri Ashwini Kumar Rai, President and Shri B. R. Patil, Member
Anirudh Rawat v. State of M.P.
Appeal No. 279 of 2020: against the order dated 2.7.2020 passed by the Collector, District Sheopur; Decided on 7.7.2023
¼1½ isVª¨fy;e fu;e] 2002 && fu- 144 && e-ç- Òw&jktLo lafgrk] 1959 && èkkjk 50 rFkk 8 && isVª¨y] Mhty rFkk lh,uth foØ; dsanz LFkkfir djus d¢ fy, fu;e 144 vèkhu vukifÙk çek.ki= iznku fd;k x;k &&- lafgrk d¢ fdlh micaèk d¢ vèkhu çnku ugÈ fd;k x;k && vk;qä ls iqujh{k.k dh vuqKk çkIr djus d¢ i'pkr~ dysDVj }kjk lafgrk dh èkkjk 50 d¢ vèkhu vukifÙk çek.ki= jí fd;k x;k && vk;qä dk dk;Z rFkk dysDVj }kjk ikfjr vkf{kIr vkns'k iw.kZr% vfèkdkfjrkjfgr && lafgrk dh èkkjk 8 d¢ vèkhu vèkh{kd 'kfä dk ç;¨x dj vikLr fd;k x;kA ¼iSjk 3
¼2½ Òw&jktLo lafgrk] 1959 ¼e-ç-½ && èkkjk 44 && vihy pykus ;¨X; g¨uk && lafgrk d¢ vèkhu fdlh micaèk dks ç;qä fd, fcuk tkjh fd;k x;k vukifÙk çek.ki= && dysDVj }kjk jí fd;k x;k && ,sls vkns'k d¢ fo#) lafgrk dh èkkjk 44 d¢ vèkhu vihy pyus ;¨X; ugÈA ¼iSjk 4] 10 ls 12
¼3½ Òw&jktLo lafgrk] 1959 && èkkjk 8 && 'kfä dh O;kfIr && dc ç;qä dh tk ldrh gS && ekeys esa voSèkrk,¡ dh xÃa && vk;qä }kjk fd;k x;k dk;Z ,oa dysDVj }kjk vukifÙk çek.ki= jí djrs gq, ikfjr vkf{kIr vkns'k iw.kZr% vfèkdkfjrkjfgr && vihy rFkk iqujh{k.k dk mipkj miyC/k ugÈ && O;fFkr i{kdkj ds lkFk U;k; djus ds fy,] ekeys esa dh xà voSèkrk,¡ lgh djus d¢ fy, jktLo eaMy }kjk vèkh{k.k dh 'kfä ç;qä dh tk ldrh gS && èkkjk 8 d¢ vèkhu 'kfä ç;qä djrs gq,] vkf{kIr vkns'k vikLr fd;k x;kA 1985 jkfu 218 voyafcrA ¼iSjk 10 ls 12
(1) Petroleum Rules, 2002 -- R. 144 -- M. P. Land Revenue Code, 1959 -- Ss. 50 and 8 -- no objection certificate granted for establishment of outlet for petrol, diesel and CNG under rule 144 -- not granted under any provision of Code -- NOC cancelled under section 50 of Code by Collector after obtaining permission of revision from Commissioner -- action of Commissioner and impugned order passed by Collector wholly without jurisdiction -- set aside exercising power of superintendence under section 8. [Paras 3, 10 to 12
(2) Land Revenue Code, 1959 (M. P.) -- S. 44 -- maintainability of appeal -- no objection certificate not issued in exercise of any provision under Code -- cancelled by Collector -- appeal under section 44 against such order not maintainable. [Para 4
(3) Land Revenue Code, 1959 (M. P.) -- S. 8 -- scope of power -- when can be exercised -- illegalities committed in matter -- action taken by Commissioner and impugned order passed by Collector cancelling no objection certificate wholly without jurisdiction -- remedy of appeal and revision not available -- to provide justice to party aggrieved, power of superintendence can be exercised by Board of Revenue to set right illegalities committed in matter -- impugned order set aside in exercise of power under section 8.1985 RN 218 relied on. [Paras 10 to 12
ORDER
1. This is an appeal, filed under the provisions of Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1995 (hereinafter referred to as ''Code'' for brevity), against the order No. 02/2020-21/Revision/6000 dated 2.7.2020, issued by District Collector, Sheopur, Whereby the No Objection Certificate No. 235/2019-20/B-121 dated 24.2.2020, issued earlier by his predencessor for establishment of a Retail Outlet for Petrol, Diesel and CNG, was cancelled, On 6.7.2020, appeal was heard by the Learned Administrative Member and vide his detailed order No. Appeal 279/2020/Sheopur/L.R. dated 14.7.2020, the appeal was dismissed by the Learned Administrative Member at the admission stage itself, on account of the same being not maintainable in the light of provisions contained in section 44 of the Code. While doing so, he however gave liberty to the appeallant to approach the ompetent Court for the reliefs prayed for. This order of the Learned Administrative Member was challenged before the Gwalior Bench of the Hon'ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh in WP No. 10356/2020. The Gwalior Bench of the Hon'ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh, vide its order dated 23.8.2021 passed in the said WP No. 10356/2020, set aside the above-mentioned order dated 14.7.2020 of the Learned Administrative Member and remanded back the case to the Board of Revenue for fresh adjudication. That's how this appeal is before us now.
2. We have head the detailed arguments of the Learned Counsels appearing on behalf of both the parties. We have also perused the records.
3. From the perusal of records, it is clear that the No Objection Certificate No. 235/2019-20/B-121 dated 24.2.2020, for revision of which District Collector, Sheopur initiated an undated note, addressed to the Commissioner, Chambal Division, seeking his permission under section 50 of the Code, on which the Commissioner, Chambal Division accorded his approval on 1.7.2020, which formed the basis for initiation of further action in this case, ultimately culminating in the issuance of the impugned order No. 02/2020-21/Revision/6000 dated 2.7.2020 of District Collector, Sheopur, was not issued in exercise of any powers under the Code, rather it was issued undr Rule 144 of Petroleum Rules, 2002, framed in exercise of powers cnferred by Petroeum Act, 1934. That means the No Objection Certificate No. 235/2019-20/B-121 dated 24.2.2020, not having been issued in exercise of any powers under the Code, is not at order, because it does not fall within the definition of ''Order'' as contained in section 56 of the Code, which defines the ''Order'', for the purposes of Chapter V of the Code releating to Appeal, Revision and Review, to mean ''the formal expression of the decision given by the Board or a Revenue Officer in respect of any matter in exercise of powers under this Code.'' Once it is held that the No Objection Certificate No. 235/2019-20/B-121 dated 24.2.2020 is not an order for the purposes of Chapter V of the Code, there remains no room for doubt that for varying or cancelling that No Objection Certificate No. 235/2019-20/B-121 dated 24.2.2020, no recourse to the provisions of Chapter V of the Code relating to Appeal, Revision and Review is possible, because those provisions are available to be taken recourse to only in case of an order issued in exercise of powers conferrd under the code. Notwithstanding the above, for cancelling the No Objection CErtiticate No. 235/2019-20/B-121 dated 24.2.2020, District Collector, Sheopur, rather than taking recourse to the provisions of learned Rules, 2002, under which the said No Objection Certificate 235/2019-20/B-121 dated 24.2.2020 had been issued, chose, for reasons best known to him, to take recourse to the provision contained is section 50 of Chapter V of the Code, which was clearly without jurisdiction. This being the legal position, the action of District Collector,Sheopur in having initated the not seeking permission of the Commissioner, Chambal Division under section 50 of the Co
The Board of Revenue exceeded its jurisdiction by entertaining a revision against a non-meritorious permit to withdraw, as the underlying assistant collector's order remained unchallenged.
The availability of an alternative remedy does not prohibit the High Court from entertaining a writ petition, especially in cases where there has been a violation of the principle of natural justice ....
The court emphasized the importance of observing the principles of natural justice and the statutory mandate in administrative decisions, particularly in the cancellation of licenses or certificates.
The court ruled that while the Revenue Divisional Officer lacked jurisdiction to act suo motu, the Joint Collector's revisional powers were valid in addressing fraudulent claims over government land.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the wide jurisdiction of the Collector under Sec. 9 of the Act, 1971 to examine the regularity, correctness, legality, or propriety of any decision....
The court ruled that an appeal under Section 35(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code is subject to revision under Section 210, emphasizing the supervisory role of the Board or Commissioner over subor....
The central legal point established in the judgment is that orders passed without jurisdiction are nullities and have no legal effect, emphasizing the significance of jurisdictional validity in admin....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.