SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(MP) 225

G. S. AHLUWALIA
Narmada Prasad Sahu – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Ashok Lalwani for petitioners; Hitendra Kumar Golhani, Panel Lawyer for respondents No. 1, 2, 3 and 9/State.

ORDER

1. This Petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed against order dated 1.12.2010 passed by SDO (Revenue), District Dindori in Revenue Case No.01(A-23) 2010-11 and order dated 22.5.2012 passed by Additional Collector, Dindori, District Dindori in Appeal No.33, 34, 35, 36 (A-23) 2010-11 by which land of petitioners has been directed to be reverted back to respondent No.7 under the provisions of section 170B of MPLR Code.

2. It is submitted by counsel for petitioners that earlier Chhutiya Kol was in possession of property in dispute in the year 1929-30. Thereafter, he surrendered his land in favour of the then Malgujar, namely; Bodhiram Teli on account of non-payment of land revenue. According to petitioners, family tree of Bodhiram Teli is as under:

 

Bodhiram Teli

 

Kathorelal

 

Ramratan

Narmada Prasad

Sharda

Parasram

3. It is submitted by counsel for petitioners that Bodhiram Teli partitioned the property during his lifetime between his sons Kathorelal and Ramratan and disputed property went to the share of Ramratan. Ramratan during his lifetime carried out family settlement and disputed property went to the share of Nanhi Bai W/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top