SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(MP) 498

G. S. AHLUWALIA
Girdhari Pawar – Appellant
Versus
Savitri Bai Barkade – Respondent


Advocates:
Mukesh Agrawal for petitioner;
Jaideep Sirpurkar for respondents No. 1 and 2;
Gajendra Parashar, Panel Lawyer for respondent No. 3/State

ORDER

1. This petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking following reliefs :-

(A). To quash the impugned orders :-

(i) Order dated 31.8.2018 passed in Ek./Rev./ Chhindwara / Bhu.Raa./2018/230 by the Board of Revenue, Gwalior. (Annexure-P/1).

(ii) Order dated 1.1.2018 passed in Rev. Case No.427/Appeal/2016-17 by the Collector, Chhindwara. (Annexure-P/2) and

(iii) Order dated 18.7.2017 passed in Rev. Case No./02/A-23/2015-16, by the SDO, Chhindwara. (Annexure-P/3) Whereby the sale deed of the petitioner has been declared as null and void in arbitrary and in illegal manner.

(B). Any other relief, order or direction as this Hon’ble Court deems proper in the present facts and circumstances of the case may also be granted along with cost of the petition.

2. It is submitted by counsel for petitioner that by registered sale deed dated 13.1.1975 petitioner purchased land bearing Khasra Nos. 296/1, 296/2 and 427 from Pandri. Thereafter, respondents No. 1 and 2 filed an application under section 170 (B) read with section 165 (6) and 7(B) of MPLR Code. The said application was allowed by SDO (Revenue) Chhindwara by order dated 18.7.2017 passed in Revenue

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top