SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 998

VISHAL DHAGAT
Vijay S/o. Ravi – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ashok Kumar Tiwari.
For the Respondent: Narendra Chourasia.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's vehicle confiscated for liquor transportation. (Para 1 , 2)
2. petitioner's argument against confiscation based on ownership. (Para 3)
3. court analysis on confiscation laws under different statutes. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
4. supreme court interpretation of confiscation under wildlife act. (Para 7)
5. petition dismissed; further legal options available. (Para 12)

ORDER :

Vishal Dhagat, J.

Petitioner has filed this petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India, challenging order dated 5-8-2022 passed by Additional District Magistrate, Betul i.e. respondent No. 3.

2. Respondent No. 3 has initiated proceedings for confiscating of Scooty vehicle bearing No. MP-MV-3221 owned by Vijay, Son of Ravi. Petitioner was proceeded ex parte as he did not appear after service of notice. District Magistrate found that vehicle in question was used in transportation of 50 bulk litres of country made liquor without any licence or permit. In said circumstances vehicle was confiscated in favour of State Government.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has challenged impugned order on ground that vehicle in question, at the time of seizure was being driven by Moh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top