SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 442

ANIL VERMA
Pankesh – Appellant
Versus
Collector, Collector Office District Barwani (Madhya Pradesh) – Respondent


Advocates:
Mitesh Jain for petitioner; Anand Bhatt, Government Advocate for respondent/State.

ORDER

1. The petitioner has filed present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India being aggrieved by the impugned order dated 3.1.2023 passed by the Collector, District Barwani (M.P.) under subsection 2 of section 47(A) of the M. P. Excise Act, 1915 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), whereby the motorcycle bearing registration number MP-46-MV-4471 owned by the present petitioner has been confiscated on account of involvement in a criminal case registered under section 34 of the Act.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner was tried under section 34 of the Act by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barwani (M.P.) and upon receiving information the Collector, Barwani initiated proceeding under section 47(A) of the Act for confiscation of the vehicle from which 60 bulk litres country made liquor was seized. The Collector after hearing both the parties, on the basis of prima facie evidence available on record, has passed the impugned order for confiscation of the aforesaid vehicle. Being aggrieved by the said order, petitioner has filed this writ petition.

3. The petitioner has preferred present writ petition mainly on the ground that Collector has no jurisdict

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top