SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 981

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
Prem Narayan Singh, J.
Sohan s/o Hiralal – Petitioner
Versus
State Of M. P. – Respondent
M. Cr. C. No. 53581 of 2023
Decided On : 13-12-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Anshul Rajpurohit
For the Respondent: Ms. Anita Singh, Ms. Ravina Bairagi

The court may grant bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure considering the nature of allegations, duration of custody, and circumstances surrounding the case.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 439 - Bail application - First bail application filed for grant of bail in relation to serious offences including abduction and rape - Allegations of false implication and prosecutrix's age being more than 16 years raised - Court allowed bail considering period of custody and circumstances of the case. (Paras 1, 5, 6)

(B) Grant of bail - Considerations for granting bail include the nature of allegations, period of custody, and likelihood of trial conclusion - Court emphasized the need for personal bond and compliance with conditions under section 437(3). (Paras 5, 6)

Facts of the case:
The applicant is in custody since 20-6-2023 for alleged abduction and rape of a prosecutrix, who reportedly did not raise any alarm during her stay with the applicant. The applicant claims false implication and argues for bail based on the duration of custody.

Findings of Court:
The court found it appropriate to grant bail, allowing the applicant to be released upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with a solvent surety.

Issues: The main issues included the prosecutrix's age, the nature of the allegations, and the applicant's right to bail considering the circumstances.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that while the allegations were serious, the applicant's prolonged custody and lack of immediate complaint from the prosecutrix warranted the granting of bail, emphasizing adherence to bail conditions.

Result: Bail application allowed.

ORDER :

Prem Narayan Singh, J.

Heard and perused the record.

This is the first bail application filed on behalf of the applicant under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of bail in relation to Crime No. 237/2023, registered at Police Station- Badnawar, District Dhar for the offence under sections 363, 366, 376, 376(2)(n), 506 of Indian Penal Code and under section 3/4 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. The applicant is in custody since 20-6-2023.

2. The allegations against the applicant is abduction and commission of rape with the prosecutrix.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the age of the prosecutrix is more than 16 years. As per the prosecution case the applicant has forcibly taken the prosecutrix and committed rape with her. The statement of the prosecutrix and her parents have been recorded under section 164 of Criminal Procedure Code and as per the statement of the prosecutrix she has resided with the applicant for about two months and seven days, however, she has not raised any alarm nor complained anyone regarding abduction or commission of rape. It is further submitted that the applicant is in jail since 20-6-2023. The conclusion of trial will take a long time. Under these circumstances, he prays for grant of bail to the applicant.

4. Learned counsel for the respondent/State as well as the objector has opposed the prayer and submitted that since the age of the prosecutrix is less than 18 years applicant is not entitled for grant of bail.

5. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and period of custody, I am of the view that it is a case, in which applicant may be released on bail. Consequently, first bail application under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of bail filed on behalf of applicant, stands allowed.

6. It is directed that applicant be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty thousand only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court, for his regular appearance before the trial Court during trial with a condition that he shall remain present before the concerned Court on all the dates fixed by it during trial. He shall abide by all the conditions enumerated under section 437(3) of Criminal Procedure Code.

7. This order shall be effective till the end of the trial. However, in case of bail jump and breach of any of the conditions of bail, it shall become ineffective.

Certified copy as per rules.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top