Back
SUBODH ABHYANKAR
SATENDRA SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
HOME DEPARTMENT PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, BHOPAL – Respondent
ORDER :
(Subodh Abhyankar, J.) :
Heard finally, with the consent of the parties.
2. This petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against the inaction on the part of the respondents to grant the pensionary benefits under old pension scheme to the petitioner, holding him to be an appointee prior to 1-1-2005.
3. In brief, the facts of the case are that the petitioner participated in an advertisement dated 19-6-2004, and was selected on the post of Guard and was allotted District Dhar vide letter dated 24-8-2004. Subsequent to his selection, the petitioner also submitted his documents for verification before the respondent No. 2 Superintendent of Police – Dhar, who, vide his letter dated 25-8-2004 directed the petitioner to submit all the relevant documents within three days time and also fill up the verification Form and submit it before the Authority. The aforesaid Form was submitted by the petitioner in the Office of Superintendent of Police, Dhar on 2-9-2004 and subsequently, petitioner’s character verification report was also submitted to the Office of S. P. Dhar on 12-9-2004. However, as the petitioner was also residing at District Bhi
Delays in administrative processes should not result in discrimination against individuals entitled to benefits under pension schemes.
Employment recruitment delays not attributable to candidates can exempt them from new pension rules, allowing adherence to older pension systems.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
