SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(MP) 319

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR
ROOPESH CHANDRA VARSHNEY, J.
MANJU CHOUHAN and Others - Petitioners
Versus
BALWANT SINGH YADAV and Others – Respondents
Misc. Appeal No. 2435 of 2021
Decided On : 12-03-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: B. D. Verma
For the Respondent: S. N. Gajendragadkar

IMPORTANT POINT
Income tax returns must be used to assess income for compensation claims, and appropriate multipliers should be applied for loss of dependency.

Headnote:

Compensation - Motor Accident Claims - The court discussed provisions related to compensation assessment, emphasizing reliance on income tax returns for income determination and applying appropriate multipliers for loss of dependency.

Fact of the Case:

The deceased was killed in a motorcycle accident caused by a bus driver’s negligence. The claimants sought compensation, which was partially awarded by the Claims Tribunal, leading to an appeal for enhancement.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the Claims Tribunal erred in assessing the deceased's income and recalculated it based on income tax returns, leading to a higher compensation amount.

Issues: Whether the Claims Tribunal correctly assessed the income of the deceased and the appropriate compensation amount.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that income tax returns are statutory documents that must be relied upon for income assessment in compensation claims.

Result: The appeal is allowed in part, modifying the compensation awarded by the Claims Tribunal.

ORDER :

(Roopesh Chandra Varshney, J.) :

Being aggrieved by quantum part of impugned award dated 29-7-2021 passed by learned Member, Second Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Gwalior in Claims Case No. 6400241/2015, appellants/claimants are before this Court. By the impugned award, the claimants (wife, children and mother) have been awarded a compensation of Rs. 16,60,750/- along with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of claim petition.

2. Briefly stated facts of the case are that on 31-8-2008 when deceased Dharmendra Singh Chauhan was going on his motorcycle from Banmore to Gwalior, it is alleged that as soon as he reached near Purani Chhawani Chauraha, due to rash and negligent driving of Mini Bus Driver/respondent No. 1, bus dashed the motorcycle due to which deceased suffered grievous hurts and died on spot. Due to death of deceased in motor accident, the appellants preferred a claim petition seeking compensation to the tune of Rs. 30,00,000/- along with interest.

3. The respondents No. 1 and 2 filed written statement stating that the bus was insured with respondent No. 3 and therefore, liability for payment of compensation amount is over the Insurance Company.

4. Respondent No. 3/Insurance Company also filed written statement denying the contents made in the claim petition. It was stated that the bus was being driver without any fitness certificate and permit.

5. On the basis of pleadings of the parties and evidence produced, learned Claims Tribunal passed the impugned award, exonerating the Insurance Company from its liability and directing it to make the payment of compensation amount with liberty to recover the same from the respondents No. 1 and 2.

6. None appeared on behalf of respondents No. 1 and 2 to assail the findings of learned Claims Tribunal. Even before the Claims Tribunal they remained ex parte after filing written statement.

7. It is the submission of learned counsel for the appellants/claimants that learned Claims Tribunal erred in assessing the income of the deceased at Rs. 1,01,000/- ;whereas, as per income tax return of year 2008-09 (Ex.P/24), income of the deceased was Rs. 1,21,645/- and thus, learned Claims Tribunal erred in assessing the income of deceased on own presumption and conjectures. In support of his arguments, he relied upon the decision of Apex Court in the matter of Anjali and ors. vs. Lokendra Rathod and ors., 2023 ACJ 637; wherein, Apex Court held that ITR is a statutory documents and has to be relied on to assess the income and fixed the monthly salary of deceased in that case on the basis of ITR.

8. Learned counsel for the Insurance Company supported the impugned award and stated that the amount so awarded is just and proper and Insurance Company has rightly been exonerated by the impugned award. He prayed for dismissal of the appeal.

9. Heard learned counsel for the parties at length and perused the record.

10. In the opinion of this Court, in the light of decision of Apex Court in the matter of Anjali (supra), the income of deceased is required to be assessed as per ITR. As per ITR, his annual income was Rs. 1,21,645/- and thus monthly income comes to Rs. 10,138/- rounded to Rs. 10,140/- per month. 1/4th towards personal expenditure has rightly been deducted by the Claims Tribunal and same is required to be done here and after deducting 1/4th towards personal expenditure, the amount remained is Rs. 10,140 - 2535/- = 7605/-. In this amount 40% is required to be added towards future prospects in light of decision of Apex Court in the matter of in the matter of National Insurance Company Limited vs. Pranay Sethi and ors., AIR 2017 SC 4973 and after adding the same, the monthly loss of dependency comes to Rs. 7605 +3042=10,647/- and yearly loss of dependency comes to Rs. 1,27,764/-. As per the age of the deceased, multiplier of 15 is required to be applied and after applying the same, the total loss of dependency comes to Rs. 19,16,460/-. To this amount, Rs. 70,000/- is required to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top