SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(MP) 365

PRANAY VERMA
Homdas Lobniya – Appellant
Versus
Madhya Pradesh Gramin Bank – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Abhishek Gilke
For the Respondent: Kamlesh Mandloi

ORDER

1. By this petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have challenged the order dated 16/6/2021 (Annexure P/5) and order dated 28/10/2021 (Annexure P/6) passed by respondent No.2 and respondent No.1 respectively whereby their claim for appointment of petitioner No.2 on compassionate basis has been rejected.

2. The facts of the case are that Rahul Lobaniya was employed with the respondents / bank as a clerk. He expired on 22/4/2021 in harness. Thereafter petitioner No.1 made an application on 8/6/2021 before respondents for appointment of petitioner No.2 on compassionate basis submitting that petitioner No.2 is brother of the deceased and the entire family is dependent upon him hence as per the policy for appointment on compassionate basis of the respondents he deserves to be granted such appointment. The application has been rejected by respondents No.1 and 2 by the impugned orders on the ground that name of petitioner No.2 was not mentioned as a dependent by the deceased while he was in service hence he is not entitled for such appointment.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the respondents have erred in rejecting t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top