IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Anand Pathak and Roopesh Chandra Varshney, JJ.
Veer Singh v. State of M.P.
Writ Petition No. 27952 of 2024 (G); Decided on 19.9.2024*
Constitution of India -- Art. 226 -- Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee (Appointment, Powers and Duties of the Ombudsman) Madhya Pradesh Rules, 2013 -- Rr. 7 and 8 -- maintainability of PIL -- matter of non-implementation or faulty implementation of scheme regarding construction work of road etc. in district – in-house statutory remedy to approach Ombudsman available -- interference declined -- if no Ombudsman appointed and functional in district, petitioner free to make representation to State Government -- direction to pass speaking order within thirty days from date of representation. [Paras 2.2 to 4]
Hkkjr dk lafo/kku & vuqPNsn 226 & egkRek xkaèkh jk"Vªh; xzkeh.k fu;¨tu çfrÒwfr ¼y¨diky dh fu;qfDr] 'kfä;ka rFkk drZO;½ eè; çns'k fu;e] 2013 & fuŒ 7 rFkk 8 & y¨dfgr ;kfpdk pyus ;¨X; g¨uk & ftys esa lM+d bR;kfn d¢ fuekZ.k dk;Z ls lacafèkr ;kstuk dk fØ;kUo;u ugha djus ;k n¨"kiw.kZ fØ;kUo;u djus dk ekeyk & y¨diky d¢ le{k tkus dk vkarfjd dkuwuh mipkj miyCèk & gLr{ksi ls bUdkj fd;k x;k & ftys esa y¨diky fu;qDr rFkk dk;Zjr ugha gks rks ;kph jkT; ljdkj d¨ vH;kosnu nsus d¢ fy, Lora= & vH;kosnu d¢ fnukad ls rhl fnu d¢ Òhrj ldkj.k vkns'k ikfjr djus dk funs'kA ¼iSjk 2-2 ls 4½
ORDER
Per: Justice Anand Pathak
1. This PIL filed u/Art. 226 of the Constitution raises alleged public cause of irregularity and illegality committed while receiving payment of money received fraudulently for construction work of road, medh bandhan and play ground in the Gram Panchayat Saraya Janpad and Zila Panchayat Bhind whereas according to the petitioner no physical construction work has been done.
2. After having heard learned counsel for rival parties on admission and perused the material placed on record it is obvious that for raising grievance against non-implementation or faulty implementation of the said Scheme there is inhouse remedy before Ombudsman appointed in every district and thereafter before the State Govt. is stipulated u/S. Sec. 32 of 2005 Act u/R. 7 & 8 of Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee (Appointment, Powers and Duties of the Ombudsman) Madhya Pradesh Rules, 2013 (for brevity 2013 Rules).
2.1 For ready reference and convenience, section 32 of 2005 Act and rules 7 & 8 of 2013 rules are reproduced below:-
“32 Power of State Government to make rules-
(1) The State Government may, by notification, and subject to the condition of previous publication, and consistent with this Act and the rules made by the Central Government, make rules to carry out the provisions of this Act.
(2) In particular, and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing power, such rules may provide for all or any of the following matters, namely:-
(a) the terms and conditions upon which eligibility for unemployment allowance may be determined under sub-section (2) of section 7;
(b) the procedure for payment of unemployment allowance under subsection (6) of section 7;
(c) the terms and conditions subject to which the Chairperson and members of the State Council may be appointed, and the time, place and procedure of the meetings (including the quorum at such meetings) of their appointment to the State Council, under sub-section (2) of section 12;
(d) the grievance redressal mechanism at the Block level and the District level and the procedure to be followed in such matter under section 19;
(e) the manner in which and the conditions and limitations subject to which the State Fund shall be utilised under sub-section (2) of section 21;
(f) the authority who may administer and the manner in which he may hold the State Fund under sub-section (3) of section 21;
(g) the manner of maintaining books of account of employment of labourers and the expenditure under sub-section (2) of section 23;
(h) the arrangements required for proper execution of Schemes under sub-section (3) of section 23;
(i) the form and manner in which the accounts of the Scheme shall be maintained under sub-section (2) of section 24;
(j) any other matter which is to be, or may be, prescribed or in respect of which provision is to be made by the State Government by rules.”
“Rule 7. Subjects of the grievances. - A grievance pertaining to any one or more of the following subjects alleging deficiency in the implementation of the Scheme may be filed with the Ombudsman:-
(i) The Gram Sabha;
(ii) Registration of households and issue of job cards;
(iii) Custody of job cards; (iv) Demand for work;
(v) Issue of dated acknowledgment against submission of application for work;
(vi) Payment of wages; (vii) Payment of unemployment allowance;
(viii) Discrimination on the basis of gender;
(ix) Work-site facilities;
(x) Measurement of work;
(xi) Quality of work;
(xii) Use of machines;
(xiii) Engagement of contractors;
(xiv) Operation of accounts in the bank or post offices;
(xv) Registration and disposal of grievances;
(xvi) Verification of muster rolls;
(xvii) Inspection of documents;
(xviii) Use of funds;
(xix) Release of funds;
(xx) Social audit;
(xxi) Maintenance of record.
8. Procedure of filing of grievance and disposal. - (1) Any person who has a grievance against t
The existence of a statutory remedy for grievance redressal before the Ombudsman and the State Government under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, 2005 was the central legal ....
The termination lacked evidence of misconduct and was based on penal clauses in the agreement. The Ombudsman's report suggested action against other parties involved in irregularities, indicating the....
The Ombudsman appointed under the MGNREGA does not have disciplinary powers over Mates and cannot impose penalties under the Act.
The Ombudsman must thoroughly investigate allegations of maladministration under the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act, as failure to do so undermines the procedures for addressing public grievances.
The Ombudsman cannot investigate complaints concerning building permits that are intertwined with matters adjudicated by a designated Tribunal, emphasizing the need to adhere to jurisdictional bounda....
Point of law : Despite receipt of notice, apart from filing a statement by some of members of Committee, no one else has cared to adduce any evidence or produce any documents before Ombudsman to just....
The Ombudsman for Local Self Government Institutions cannot entertain complaints related to matters that are within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal for Local Self Government Institutions, particular....
The Ombudsman's jurisdiction is limited to investigating allegations of corruption or maladministration and cannot adjudicate on private disputes. Availability of other remedies before the Tribunal a....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.