SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(MP) 494

ACHAL KUMAR PALIWAL
Khem Chand (Dead) Through LRs Siddharth Kumar Jain – Appellant
Versus
Parasram – Respondent


Advocates:
Sachin Jain for appellants;
Aditya Choubey, Government Advocate for respondent No. 4/State.

JUDGMENT

1. This first appeal has been filed by the appellant/plaintiff under section 96 of CPC against the order dated 17.12.2012 passed in Civil Suit No.27-A/2008 (Khemchand v. Parsram and others) by Additional District Judge, Rehli District Sagar seeking setting aside of impugned judgment and decree.

2. Brief facts of the case relevant for disposal of present appeal are that plaintiff along with some other persons formed a partnership and above firm, purchased land bearing khasra No. 69 and 70 through registered sale deed dated 14.3.1983. Above firm was dissolved on 13.1.1984 and there was oral partition between partners of the firm. In above partition, plaintiff got suit property i.e. survey Nos. 69 and 70 on 13.1.1984. Partnership dissolution deed was executed on 13.01.1984. Plaintiff is owner of disputed property, i.e. survey Nos. 69 and 70. In the year 2016, defendants No. 1 to 3, illegally took possession of suit property. Plaintiff filed an application under section 250 of MPLRC before revenue court but this application is still pending and has not been decided till today. With aforesaid averments, plaintiff filed a present suit for delivery of possession, mesne profits and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top