SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(MP) 579

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
Vivek Agarwal, J.
Pushpendra Singh Rajpoot S/o Thane Ram Singh - Appellant
Vs.
The State Of M.P. Thr. Its Secretary Department Of Health And Family Welfare Vallabh Bhawan Bhopal (Madhya Pradesh) - Respondent
Writ Petition No. 9692 of 2021, Writ Petition No. 10154 of 2022
Decided On : 30-04-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Shri Anil Kumar Dwivedi Adv.
For the Respondent: Shri Piyush Bhatnagar

EWS reservation under Article 16(6) of the Constitution applies only to the General category and does not extend to SC, ST, or OBC categories.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 16(6) - Reservation for Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) - Petitioners contended that only 4 out of 22 posts were earmarked for EWS, contrary to the 10% quota - Court found that EWS reservation applies only to the General category and not to SC, ST, or OBC - Earmarking of 4 posts was not arbitrary as it complied with constitutional provisions. (Paras 4-8)

(B) Reservation Principles - The court emphasized that EWS reservation is distinct from reservations for backward classes and is limited to General category applicants. (Paras 6-7)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners applied for 219 Laboratory Technician posts, arguing that the EWS quota was insufficiently applied, resulting in their non-selection despite merit.

Findings of Court:
The court concluded that the allocation of 4 posts under the EWS category was constitutional and justified.

Issues: The main issue was whether the allocation of posts under the EWS category was arbitrary and in violation of constitutional provisions.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that EWS reservation is exclusively for the General category and does not extend to SC, ST, or OBC categories, affirming that the allocation of posts was lawful.

Result: Petition dismissed.

ORDER :

Petitioners' contention is that they were candidates for appointment to the post of Laboratory Technician. Professional Examination Board had issued an advertisement for 219 posts of Laboratory Technician.

2. It is submitted that 10% quota for EWS category, if would have been applied, then 22 posts should have been earmarked for EWS category but, respondents have earmarked only 4 posts under EWS category, as a result of which, petitioners despite of merit, could not get selected on the post of Laboratory Technician under the EWS category.

3. Though Shri Bhatnagar, learned Panel Lawyer, prays for time to file reply and the respondent No.3 has filed a reply, saying that they have nothing to do with it, but it is a sad story about the affairs of the State that they are not able to address the basic issue promptly and such lethargy and indifference on the part of the State results in dragging of frivolous litigation.

4. Provisions contained in Article 16(6) of the Constitution of India, which deals with Reservation for Economically Weaker Section, reads as under :-

Signature Not Verified

    "16(6). Nothing in this article shall prevent the State from making any provision for the reservation of appointments or posts in favour of any economically weaker sections of citizens other than the classes mentioned in clause (4), in addition to the existing reservation and subject to a maximum of ten per cent of the posts in each category."

5. Thus, the reservation for economically weaker sections of citizens is only available in those classes which are not covered in clause (4) of Article 16. Clause (4) and (4A), reads as under :-

    "(4). Nothing in this article shall prevent the State from making any provision for the reservation of appointments or posts in favour of any backward class of citizens which, in the opinion of the State, is not adequately represented in the services under the State."

    (4A) Nothing in this article shall prevent the State from making any provision for reservation [in matters of promotion, with consequential seniority to any class] or classes of posts in the services under the State in favour of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes which, in the opinion of the State, are not adequately represented in the services under the State."

6. Thus, it is evident that plain reading of Article 16(6) leaves no iota of doubt that reservation for economically weaker section excludes SC, ST and OBC category.

7. Thus, it is evident that EWS reservation is available only for General category and is not extendable to OBC, SC or ST. Thus, when examined from this perspective, then total posts available under the unreserved category in the cadre of Laboratory Technician is 34, then earmarking 4 posts under the EWS category cannot be said to be arbitrary, because there could not have been 10% reservation of total number of posts of 219 out of which 122 are for the OBC, 46 for ST and 13 for SC category.

8. In view of such facts, since earmarking of 4 posts under the EWS category is in consonance with the constitutional provision, petition is devoid of merit and is hereby dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top