SUBODH ABHYANKAR
Asharani, W/o. Dr. Vipin Bihari Jain – Appellant
Versus
State Of Madhya Pradesh Station House Officer Through P. S. Shujalpur (Madhya Pradesh) – Respondent
ORDER :
(Subodh Abhyankar, J.)
Heard finally with the consent of the parties.
2] This petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. against the FIR dated 31.03.2017 lodged at Crime No.134/2017 at Police Station Shujalpur, District Shajapur under Sections 269, 337, 336 and 308 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and the consequent criminal proceedings arising out of the aforesaid crime number.
3] The allegation against the petitioner is that at the relevant time, she was posted as a doctor in Government Hospital and was working as a Gynecologist and it is alleged that the complainant Smt. Preeti Nema had labour pain and thus, was taken to the Government Hospital Shujalpur where the petitioner was posted and according to the FIR, the petitioner initially advised them to get her admitted in a private hospital, however, at the instance of the family members of the complainant, she was operated upon by the petitioner on 27.12.2016 and was discharged on 03.01.2017. In this operation, the petitioner gave birth to a child, however, as she was suffering from pain, she got herself examined through various investigating agencies and her CT scan was also conducted and it w
Simrikhia Vs. Dolley Mukherjee and Chhabi Mukherjee and Another reported as (1990) 2 SCC 437
State represented by DSP, SB CID
A. Srimannarayana Vs. Dasari Santakumari and Another reported as (2013) 9 SCC 496
V. Krishna Rao Vs. Nikhil Superspeciality Hospital reported as (2010) 5 SCC 513
Kurban Hussein Mohammedali Rangwalla v. State of Maharashtra
Criminal liability for medical negligence requires a higher degree of negligence than civil cases, necessitating proof beyond reasonable doubt.
Medical professionals cannot be prosecuted for negligence unless there is gross negligence established through expert opinion; mere errors or lack of consent do not suffice.
Criminal prosecution for medical negligence requires evidence of gross negligence, not merely attendance during emergencies, and must be substantiated with expert testimony.
Criminal negligence requires substantial proof of gross negligence; mere allegations do not suffice for prosecution under IPC, particularly in medical cases.
A negative final report does not bar further investigation and prosecution in cases of medical negligence requires substantial expert evidence.
Medical negligence accusations must be substantiated by clear evidence; mere allegations, without expert consensus on negligence, are insufficient for criminal liability.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of expert medical opinion in cases of alleged medical negligence and the need for a high degree of negligence to establish criminal....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.