SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 1033

VISHAL DHAGAT
Mubarak Khan – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Piyush Bhatnagar
For the Respondent: S.K. Shrivastava

Table of Content
1. minor's entitlement to juvenile court trial (Para 1 , 2)
2. contention on application of child rights legislation (Para 3 , 4)
3. court's interpretation of relevant laws (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
4. final dismissal of the criminal revision (Para 8)

ORDER :

1. Applicant has filed this criminal revision under section 102 of Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Act, 2015 against the order dated 02.07.2024 (Annexure-P/2) passed by the Children Court, Shahdol, District-Shahdol (MP) in SCATR No. 66/2022.

2. Applicant has filed an application before the trial Court that applicant was minor at the time of incident and was less than 18 years, therefore, he ought to have been tried by Juvenile Justice Board and not by Children Court. Application filed by applicant was dismissed by the trial Court vide impugned dated 02.07.2024.

3. Learned counsel appearing for applicant has relied upon the Commission for Protection of Child Rights Act, 2005. It is submitted that as per Chapter-V, Section 25 of the said Act, Children's Court has been constituted for speedy trial of offences against children or of violation of child rights. It is submitted that Children's Court will try offenc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top