SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 1033

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
VISHAL DHAGAT, J.
Mubarak Khan – Appellant
Versus
The State of Madhya Pradesh and Others – Respondents
Criminal Revision No. 4922 of 2024
Decided On : 25-10-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Piyush Bhatnagar
For the Respondent: S.K. Shrivastava

The jurisdiction of Children's Court in juvenile cases depends on whether the offence is heinous and the offender is between 16-18 years, as per relevant acts.

Headnote:(A) Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Act, 2015 - Section 102 - Commission for Protection of Child Rights Act, 2005 - Section 25 - Criminal revision regarding jurisdiction of Children's Court in trying cases involving juveniles - The applicant argued that he should have been tried by the Juvenile Justice Board instead of the Children's Court based on his age at the time of the incident. The trial Court held that it acted correctly, as the Juvenile Justice Board had already determined the nature of the offence. The court emphasized that Section 25 of the Commission Act, when read with the Juvenile Justice Act, clarifies that cases involving juvenile offenders could be transferred to a Children's Court if the nature of the offence is heinous and the juvenile is between 16-18 years. (Paras 2, 6, 7)

Findings of Court:
The court dismissed the criminal revision, finding the trial Court's order to be correct regarding the jurisdiction of the Children's Court.

Issues: The principal issue was whether the trial Court erred in not trying the applicant under the Juvenile Justice Board.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that the transfer of the applicant's case to the Children's Court was appropriate following the inquiry by the Juvenile Justice Board.

Result: Criminal Revision is dismissed.

Table of Content
1. minor's entitlement to juvenile court trial (Para 1 , 2)
2. contention on application of child rights legislation (Para 3 , 4)
3. court's interpretation of relevant laws (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
4. final dismissal of the criminal revision (Para 8)

ORDER :

1. Applicant has filed this criminal revision under section 102 of Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Act, 2015 against the order dated 02.07.2024 (Annexure-P/2) passed by the Children Court, Shahdol, District-Shahdol (MP) in SCATR No. 66/2022.

2. Applicant has filed an application before the trial Court that applicant was minor at the time of incident and was less than 18 years, therefore, he ought to have been tried by Juvenile Justice Board and not by Children Court. Application filed by applicant was dismissed by the trial Court vide impugned dated 02.07.2024.

3. Learned counsel appearing for applicant has relied upon the Commission for Protection of Child Rights Act, 2005. It is submitted that as per Chapter-V, Section 25 of the said Act, Children's Court has been constituted for speedy trial of offences against children or of violation of child rights. It is submitted that Children's Court will try offence where victims are children but not in cases where offence is said to have been committed by juvenile. In view of same, order passed by trial Court is defective and same may be set aside.

4. Learned Government Advocate appearing for the State submitted that no error can be found in the order passed by the trial Court.

5. Heard the counsel for the parties.

6. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant is unable to understand the import of Children's Court. Children' Court has been constituted under Section 25 of the Commission for Protection of Child Rights Act, 2005. In said Section, it has been mentioned that Children's Court constituted for purpose of speedy trial of offence against children or of violation of child rights. At first glance of said Section, Children's Court appears to be Court which are trying the cases where child rights has been violated and victims are children. But, Section 25 is to be read along with Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015. In Section 2(20) of said Act, Children's Court has been defined. In said Section, it has been mentioned that Children' Court means a Court established under the Commission for Protection of Child Rights Act, 2005 or Special Court under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. In Sections 15 and 18 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, it is laid down that Juvenile Justice Board will carry out an inquiry whether child in conflict with law or not. Juvenile Justice Board will also consider the facts and circumstances of the case to determine the fact whether offence committed by juvenile is of heinous nature and if he is between 16-18 years then whether he is to be tried as an Adult. If Juvenile Justice Board comes to a conclusion that a juvenile is between 16-18 years and he has committed a heinous offence then his case is to be transferred to Children's Court for trial.

7. In this criminal revision, case of applicant has been transferred to Children's Court after inquiry by Juvenile Justice Board, therefore, no error has been committed by Court in dismissing the application.

8. Criminal Revision is dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top