SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(MP) 18

SUBODH ABHYANKAR
Vikram Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Akhilesh Kumar Saxena for appellant;
Ms. Mradula Sen, Government Advocate/Panel Lawyer for respondent/State.

JUDGEMENT

1. Heard finally, with the consent of the parties.

2. This criminal appeal has been filed under section 374(2) of Cr.P.C., by the appellant – Vikram Singh S/o. Bane Singh, against the judgement dated 4.7.2000 passed in S.T. No.47/1999 by I Additional Sessions Judge, Ujjain (M.P.) whereby finding the appellant guilty, the learned Judge of the trial Court has convicted him as under:-

Conviction

Sentence

 

Section Act

307        IPC

25(1B)(a)    Arms Act

Imprisonment

5 years R.I.

1 year R.I.     

Fine

Rs.500/- 

Rs.500/- 

Imprisonment in lieu of Fine

1 year R.I.

3 months R.I.

3. In brief, the facts of the case are that on 14.05.1998, at around 10 am in the morning when the complainant PW/3 Mohammad Sattar Qureshi, a resident of Gram Undasa, was sitting outside of his quarter, and his son Mohammad Anees, one Sultan, Kamleshwar and Peerulal of village were chatting, at that time, accused persons, namely, Babu Singh, Vikram Singh (the present appellant), and their uncle Ratan Singh, whose name was not known at that time, came and started abusing them, and when they were opposed, Babu Singh and Vikram Singh took out their country made pistols, whereas

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top