SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(MP) 668

VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA
Sangita Agnihotri – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Jagdish Baheti for petitioner; Prakhar Trivedi, Panel Lawyer for respondent/State.

ORDER

1. The petitioner is challenging the order of recovery from deceased employee on the ground of wrong fixation of pay.

2. The facts of the case are that the husband of the petitioner was initially appointed as Assistant Sub-Inspector (M) and thereafter he was promoted on the post of Sub-Inspector (M). He died in harness on 20.10.2015 when he was working on the post of Sub-Inspector (M) in the office of Superintendent of Police Special Branch (Rail), Indore.

3. Counsel for the petitioner submits that on 15.3.2016, the respondents proposed to be recovered an amount Rs.20,96,548/- (principal Rs.12,79,696/- + Rs.8,16,852/- interest) from her deceased husband without there being any fault on the part of the deceased employee under various heads as excess payment alleged to have been made during the service of the husband of the petitioner and the recovery was done from the arrears of pension, GPF, leave encashment on 5.4.2023. By order dated 15.3.2016, 5.4.2023 and 26.4.2023 the respondents proposed to be recovered the amount against her husband.

4. Counsel for the State submits that the respondents have recovered only the principal part out of the said amount from the retiral dues of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top