Back
MILIND RAMESH PHADKE
Shivraj Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
ORDER
[Regard being had to the similitude of the controversy, these nine petitions were heard analogously and decided by this common order. For factual convenience, facts as narrated in W.P. No.4374 of 2012 are taken into consideration.]
1. The instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is preferred against the order dated 25.5.2012 passed by the respondent No.1 in case No.F-22-12/2004/28, whereby the order dated 8.10.2009 by which the present petitioners were allotted lands bearing survey Nos.58 and 343 admeasuring about 6.511 hectares and 0.533 hectares respectively situated in village Mungwara, Tahsil Gulabganj District Vidisha under the provisions of the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1954, was set aside holding that the said order was passed after the Act of 1954 itself was repealed by the Govt. of India in the year 2005, therefore, the authority had no jurisdiction to pass such an order.
2. For convenience, the proceedings in pursuance to which the above writ petitions had been filed are mentioned in the reference which are as under:
| S. No. | W.P. Nos. | Reference Case Nos. |
| 1 | 4374/2012 | F-22-12/2004/28 |
| 2 | 4627/2012 | F-22-12/2 |
Authority under the Evacuee Interest Act persists post-repeal, ensuring resolution of pending claims amidst administrative neglect.
principle of res-judicata- Once the proceedings got concluded by judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Major Chandra Bhan Singh vs. Latafat Ullah Khan (supra), any subsequent proceedings on th....
The court confirmed that review powers do not extend to revising decisions made by higher authority under applicable claims legislation.
The cancellation of pattadar passbooks for land requires substantial proof of fraud or illegality, and must adhere to principles of natural justice and binding judicial precedents.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that while the Civil Court's jurisdiction was ousted, the plaintiffs could succeed in insisting on following the procedure under Section 12 of the ....
The necessity of Custodian's confirmation under Section 40 of the Displaced Persons Act for the validity of sales is essential; without it, property transfers involving evacuee property are void.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
