SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(MP) 68

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Vivek Rusia and Gajendra Singh, JJ.
Panjab Nation Bank Acting v. Additional District Magistrate
Writ Petition No. 1327 of 2025(I); Decided on 29.1.2025

Advocates appeared:
Rohit Dubey for petitioner; Sudeep Bhargava Deputy Advocate General for respondents/State.

A secured creditor loses its rights under the SARFAESI Act upon the auction of mortgaged property, precluding further claims for possession under the same Act.

Headnote:(A) Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 - Section 13 - Writ petition for direction under Article 226 for execution of order passed under Section 14 - Petitioner, a bank, sought assistance to take possession of mortgaged property - After auction sale, property became owned by auction purchaser; bank ceased to hold secured interest - Dismissal of petition was justified as the bank could not seek further assistance under the SARFAESI Act. (Paras 1-9)

(B) Secured creditor's rights - Ample power to enforce security without court intervention but loses such status after auction sale - Rights must be exercised according to prescribed legal provisions. (Paras 6-8)

Facts of the case:
The Punjab National Bank filed for directions to execute an order for possession of mortgaged property after declaring a loan as non-performing. Following proceedings, the property was auctioned, and sale certificates issued, leading to the present petition.

Findings of Court:
The petition was dismissed as the secured creditor's role ended upon the auction sale, rendering the request for assistance under the SARFAESI Act moot.

Issues: Whether the bank retained status as a secured creditor post-auction and the applicability of SARFAESI provisions thereafter.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that following the auction of the mortgaged property, the bank no longer maintained secured creditor status and therefore could not invoke SARFAESI provisions for recovery or possession efforts.

Result: Writ Petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's claim for possession of mortgaged property. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. secured creditor's rights under sarfaesi act. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
3. writ petition dismissed. (Para 9)

ORDER

Per: Justice Vivek Rusia

With the consent of parties, heard finally.

1. The petitioner / Punjab National Bank has filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking direction to respondent No.1 to execute the order dated 11.11.2022 passed by the Additional District Magistrate, Agar Malwa in exercise of power conferred under section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (in short 'SARFAESI Act').

2. The petitioner extended the credit facility to M/s Ruchi Agri Fresh Private Limited vide sanction letter dated 24.7.2015. On 31.3.2021, the account was declared non-performing asset due to default in repayment of loan.

3. A notice under section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act was issued for recovery of the outstanding balance of Rs.1,01,98,107.68/-. Thereafter, possession notice under 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act was issued on 2.9.2021 and symbolic possession of the mortgaged property was taken by the Bank.

4. In order to take the possession of the mortgaged property, the Bank filed an application before the Additional District Magistrate. Vide order dated 11.11.2022, the Tehsildar was directed to provide assistance to the petitioner in order to take possession of the property.

5. After the aforesaid order, in order to recover the loan amount, the petitioner / Bank proceeded with the sale of mortgaged property. After the auction sale, two sale certificates dated 17.01.2023 have been issued in favour of the auction purchaser. The details are given in para - 5.8 of the petition and the certificates are filed as Annexure-P/5 along with this writ petition. According to the petitioner, the borrower has not handed over the possession of the aforesaid property to them, therefore, the present petition is filed seeking direction to respondent No.2 to execute the order dated 11.11.2022.

6. Section 13 of the SARFAESI Act provides that any security interest created in favour of any secured creditor may be enforced, without the intervention of the Court or Tribunal, by such creditor in accordance with the provision of this Act. In case, the borrower fails to discharge is liability in full within the period specified in sub-section (2), the secured creditor may take recourse either to take possession of the secured assets of the borrower including the right to transfer by way of lease, assignment or sale or to take over the management of business of the borrower including the right to transfer. If the measures are taken under section 13(4)(a), the secured creditor may approach the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate or District Magistrate to seek assistance in taking possession of the secured assets for the purpose of sale or transfer under the provisions of this Act.

7. For ready reference, section 13 of the SARFAESI Act is reproduced below:

''13. Enforcement of security interest - ( 1 ) Notwithstanding anything contained in section 69 or section 69-A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (4 of 1882), any security interest created in favour of any secured creditor may be enforced, without the intervention of the Court or tribunal, by such creditor in accordance with the provisions of this Act.

( 2 ) Where any borrower, who is under a liability to a secured creditor under a security agreement, makes any default in repayment of secured debt or any installment thereof, and his account in respect of such debt is classified by the secured creditor as non-performing asset, then, the secured creditor may require the borrower by notice in writing to discharge in full his liabilities to the secured creditor within sixty days from the date of notice failing which the secured creditor shall be entitled to exercise all or any of the rights under sub-section (4).

Pr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top