SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(MP) 699

VIVEK JAIN
Ram Vishal Pateriya – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Anil Lala for petitioner; Kamlesh Dwivedi for caveator; Naveen Dubey, Government Advocate for respondent/State.

ORDER

1. The present petition has been filed challenging the suspension order Annexure P/9 dated 13.6.2024, alleged to be issued under instructions of the Registrar, Cooperative societies of Madhya Pradesh, vide Annexure P-8 dated 12.6.2024. The petitioner is working on the substantive post of Manager (Accounts), in District Central Cooperative Bank, Chhatarpur (hereinafter referred to as “Bank”).

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order Annxure P/9 has been passed in colourable exercise of powers because the order though is signed by the CEO of the Bank under authority of the Staff SubCommittee, but from perusal of the letter Annexure P-8 it is evident that the Registrar, Cooperative Societies has issued instructions for the same and thus, the order has been issued under instructions and dictate of a third authority.

3. The learned counsel further submitted that the matter alleged against the petitioner relates to irregularities in appointment of Society Managers, however, the said ground is not made out for the reason that the Society Managers who were recruited in the process in which irregularity is alleged, have already been granted stay by this Court in vario

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top