SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(MP) 103

ANAND PATHAK, HIRDESH
Vandana Pal – Appellant
Versus
Dharmendra Pal – Respondent


Advocates:
H. K. Shukla for appellant;
Manas Dubey and Yogendra Bhardwaj for respondent.

Table of Content
1. custody applications under the guardians and wards act. (Para 2 , 3)
2. allegations against each parent regarding neglect. (Para 4 , 5)
3. appellant’s arguments contesting the ex parte order. (Para 8 , 9)
4. welfare of the child as the paramount consideration. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 19)
5. court affirms family court’s decision. (Para 20 , 21)

ORDER

Hirdesh, J. -- 1. The instant miscellaneous appeal under section 47 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 has been preferred by appellant- wife assailing ex parte order dated 23.2.2024 passed by Additional Judge to the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Gwalior in RCSHM No.29 of 2021, whereby the application filed by respondent -husband under section 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 has been allowed.

2. Facts giving rise to present appeal, in short, are that respondent husband filed an application under section 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, pleading that his marriage was solemnized with appellant according to Hindu customs and rites on 29th of April, 2007 in the City of Gwalior. From their marital relationship, a son, Mayank Pal was born on 26.9.2008. It was further pleaded that he is residing i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top