SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(MP) 81

DWARKADHISH BANSAL
Hirdesh Dwivedi – Appellant
Versus
Ramu @ Gaurav Bhavsar – Respondent


Advocates:
R.S. Tiwari for appellant; Ashok Lalwani with Akash Lalwani for respondent.

JUDGMENT

1. This first appeal has been preferred by the appellant/defendant/tenant challenging the judgment and decree dated 1.11.2010 passed by First Additional District Judge, Raisen in civil suit No.10-A/2006 whereby trial Court has decreed respondent/plaintiff/landlord’s civil suit for eviction on the grounds under section 12(1)(f),(g)&(h) of the M.P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’).

2. In short the facts are that the plaintiff instituted a suit with the allegations that plaintiff is owner of the shop in question admeasuring 10X20 sq.ft., which was let out on rent by previous owner and landlord Mahendra Singh to the defendant. It is alleged that father of the plaintiff namely Omprakash Bhavsar purchased the building of the shop (total area 10X84 = 840 sq.ft.) vide registered sale deed dated 5.12.1994 from its owner and got raised construction after due permission of the competent authority. After purchase of the shop, the defendant started making payment of rent to the plaintiff and paid monthly rent of Rs.1,000/- to the plaintiff upto 31.12.1995 and stopped paying rent w.e.f. 1.1.1996, hence a notice demanding arrears of rent was issued to the defendant. It

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top