SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(MP) 125

MANINDER S. BHATTI
Shyam Sunder – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
J.P. Singrol for appellants; Shailendra Mishra, Deputy Government Advocate for respondents/State; Dharmendra Patel for complainant.

ORDER

1. This criminal appeal has been filed by the appellants being aggrieved by the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 20.9.2017 passed by Additional Session Judge Niwari, District Tikamgarh in Session Trial No.218/2015, whereby the appellants have been convicted under section 420 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced them to undergo R.I. for 3 years with fine of Rs.1000/-to each appellants, section 467 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced them to undergo R.I. for 5 years with fine of Rs.1000/-to each appellants, section 468 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced them to undergo R.I. for 5 years with fine of Rs.1000/-to each appellants and section 471 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced them to undergo R.I. for 5 years with fine of Rs.1000/-to each appellants with default stipulations.

2. The counsel for the appellants submits that during the pendency of the present appeal, good sense prevailed over the parties and the appellants and complainant have arrived at an amicable settlement and therefore, in view of the compromise entered into between the parties, the appellants be acquitted of the aforesaid offences. I.A. No.2077 of 2025 [(under section 320(1) of Cr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top