SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(MP) 145

MILIND RAMESH PHADKE
Ram Singh Raghuvanshi – Appellant
Versus
Urmila (Died) through LRs Smt. Shashi Raghuvanshi – Respondent


Advocates:
Deependra Singh Raghuvanshi for petitioner; Akshat Kumar Jain for respondent.

ORDER

1. The instant petition, under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, has been filed by the petitioner against the order dated 5.10.2018 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Gwalior Division, Gwalior in a Second Appeal No.651/2016-17; whereby, while allowing the said appeal, the order of Sub-Divisional Officer, Gwalior dated 31.7.2017 whereby the order of mutation of the petitioner in the revenue records vide Resolution No.17, dated 24.7.2004 on the basis of sale deed dated 12.1.2001 was set aside, was affirmed.

2. Short facts of the case are that the present petitioner had purchased the land bearing Survey No.1527, ad-measuring 1.62 hectares by way of registered sale deed dated 12.1.2001 from late Urmila through her husband Hari Singh as her power of attorney dated 10.1.2001. On the basis of the said sale deed, name of petitioner got duly mutated in the revenue records by the Gram Panchayat by passing resolution No.17 vide order dated 24.7.2004. After lapse of 10 years, the respondent (since deceased) had filed an application before the SubDivisional Officer, challenging the said order of mutation, which was registered as Case No.59/2013-14/Appeal. Vide order dated 31

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top