SUJOY PAUL
Pooja Agrawal – Appellant
Versus
Shivbhan Singh Rathore – Respondent
Sujoy Paul, J.
The petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to challenge the proceedings of Criminal Case No. 1248/2009 pending before Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhind. The petitioner has also challenged the order of Revisional Court dated 7.8.2009.
2. Shri Raju Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is running an ultra sound clinic in the name and style of Divyam Ultrasound Centre at Bhind. The petitioner is a qualified Radiologist and Sonologist. The petitioner's clinic is duly registered under the provisions of Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994 (for brevity, the "Act of 1994"). Shri Sharma submits that respondent No.1 is a habitual complainant. He preferred series of vague complaints against various doctors of Bhind. None of these complaints could fetch any result and allegations mentioned therein could not be proved. Attention of this Court is drawn on a compilation prepared and filed on 28.9.2015. By taking this Court to page 55, 68, 99, 1
Amit Kapoor v. Ramesh Chander and another
Daman Municipal Council and another etc. v. M/s Paramount Traders and others
Pepsi Foods v. Special Judicial Magistrate
Rishipal Singh v. State of U.P. & Anr.
State of Haryana and others v. Ch. Bhajan Lal and others
Voluntary Health Association of Punjab v. Union of India and Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.