SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(MP) 946

SUJOY PAUL
Pooja Agrawal – Appellant
Versus
Shivbhan Singh Rathore – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Shri Raju Sharma, Advocate, Shri H.K. Shukla, Advocate
For the Respondent: Shri A.S. Rathore, PL.

ORDER :

Sujoy Paul, J.

The petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to challenge the proceedings of Criminal Case No. 1248/2009 pending before Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhind. The petitioner has also challenged the order of Revisional Court dated 7.8.2009.

2. Shri Raju Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is running an ultra sound clinic in the name and style of Divyam Ultrasound Centre at Bhind. The petitioner is a qualified Radiologist and Sonologist. The petitioner's clinic is duly registered under the provisions of Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994 (for brevity, the "Act of 1994"). Shri Sharma submits that respondent No.1 is a habitual complainant. He preferred series of vague complaints against various doctors of Bhind. None of these complaints could fetch any result and allegations mentioned therein could not be proved. Attention of this Court is drawn on a compilation prepared and filed on 28.9.2015. By taking this Court to page 55, 68, 99, 1


































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top