SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(MP) 651

ANJULI PALO
Mohit Jain – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Promod Singh Tomar for petitioner; Amit Pandey, Panel Lawyer, for respondent No. 1/State.

ORDER

1. On the request of learned counsel for both the parties, heard finally at motion stage.

2. Perused the case diary.

3. This petition has been filed by the applicants under section 482 of the CrPC for quashing the FIR registered at Crime No. 223/2018 and subsequent criminal proceedings arising out of the same crime registered by Police Station, M.P. Nagar, Bhopal against the applicants for offence punishable under sections 306 and 120B of the IPC lodged by the respondent No. 2.

4. The respondent No. 2 is mother of deceased Saurabh Singh.

5. In brief the prosecution case is that one Skoda Car was purchased by deceased Saurabh Singh and his father. After sometime, said car was given to the applicants on rent. Due to some dispute between the deceased and applicants, said car was kept by the applicants. As per complaint filed by the respondent No. 2, Saurabh Singh committed suicide on 11.10.2017 due to abetment of the applicants. A written complaint was filed by the complainant on 19.12.2017 after two months of the incident. Hence, Police Station, M.P. Nagar, Bhopal registered a crime under sections 306 and 120B of the IPC against the applicants.

6. In order to convict a person under s











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top