Back
S.K.PALO
SONERAM RATHORE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent
S.K. PALO, J.
1. This revision under Section 397 read with Section 401 of Cr.P.C. has been filed challenging the legality, validity and propriety of the impugned order dated 31.10.2014 passed by the IIASJ, Sabalgarh in ST No. 63/2013, by which the application under Section 311 of Cr.P.C. for re-calling the witness has been rejected. The facts just necessary for disposal of the case are that; the petitioner is accused in ST No. 63/13 and facing charge under Section 376 of IPC During the trial, PW-1, prosecutrix was examined on 17.5.2013. PW-2 Darshan was examined on 18.6.2013, PW-3, Dr. Archna has been examined on 19.6.2013.
2. The petitioner/accused filed an application under Section 311 of Cr.P.C. dated 2509/2014 which was decided by the impugned order dated 31.10.2014 by the trial Court. The petitioner accused submitted that during the examination of prosecutrix some important questions could not be asked by Advocate Shri A.K. Shrivastava. Therefore, her cross examination could not be conducted properly and effectively. The mistake committed by the counsel has to be corrected. Now, the petitioner accused has changed his counsel. Now, the petitioner is represented by Shri Pur
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
