SANJAY YADAV, S.K.AWASTHI
Hemdutt Mourya – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
1. This order shall govern the final disposal of W.P. No. 2185/2017, W.P. No. 6187/2017 and W.P. No. 6202/2017 which though were heard on different dates, but are decided by this common order as the issue involved is similar. Rustication from the M.B.B.S. Course by order dated 22.03.2017 and 03.06.2017 has driven the petitioners to file these petitions for the quashment of said order. Relevant facts are taken from Writ Petition No. 2185/2017.
2. The reasons for rustication as borne out from the impugned order is that the petitioner who got admission in the M.B.B.S. Course in the year 2010 used unfair means and got admission through impersonation for which an offence is registered against him forming subject matter of Crime No. 358/2014 for offences punishable under Section 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 201, 120-B IPC and Section 3/4 of Madhya Pradesh Examination Act. Later on the investigation being taken over by the Central Bureau of Investigation and by letter No. 547 dated 09.04.2016, the case is transferred and remembered as RC 217201580109.
3. Contention of the petitioner is that for the same reasons, the petitioner was rusticated by order dated 11.04.2016 which was challenged
Arun Sharma vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Nidhi Kaim and Another vs. State of M.P. and Others
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.