Back
A.K.SHRIVASTAVA
SHABIR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Judgment passed in this appeal shall also govern the disposal of connected Criminal Appeals No. 1057/1996 (Ramprasad vs. State of M. P.) and 1068/1996 (Dinesh vs. State of M. P.) since they have arisen from the common judgment of conviction and order of sentence.
2. Feeling aggrieved by the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 5-12-1996 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Agar, District Shajapur in Sessions Trial No. 137/1985 convicting the appellants under sections 395 and 450, Indian Penal Code and thereby sentencing them to suffer R.I. of four years and three years respectively apart from the fine and the defaulting clause mentioned in the impugned judgment, the appellants have knocked the doors of this Court by preferring this appeal under section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
3. No exhaustive statements of fact are required to be narrated for the purpose of disposal of this appeal. Suffice it to say that on the report lodged by Ramchandra Soni a case was registered against the appellants under sections 457 and 380, Indian Penal Code, but, later on it was altered to sections 450 and 395 Indian Penal Code. After the stolen arti
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
