Back
C.V.SIRPURKAR
Narayan Sahu – Appellant
Versus
State Of M. P. – Respondent
ORDER :
Shri Bhupendra Shukla, counsel for the petitioner. Shri P. K. Pandey, Government Advocate for the respondent/State.
2. The case is posted for admission; however, since, all documents necessary for disposal of this miscellaneous criminal case are filed and the respondent is represented, the matter is admitted and heard finally by consent.
3. This miscellaneous criminal case under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is directed against the order dated 27-4-2016 passed by the Court of II Additional Sessions Judge, Damoh, in Criminal Case No. 10/2016, whereby the order dated 18-1-2016 passed by the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Damoh in Criminal Case No. 2696/2015 rejecting the application filed by accused Narayan Sahu under section 451 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, was affirmed.
4. The facts necessary for disposal of this miscellaneous criminal case may briefly be summarized as hereunder : Petitioner Narayan and co-accused Chhatrapal are facing trial before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Damoh under section 34(2) of the M.P. Excise Act, 1915. A TVS motorcycle No. MP34-MA-5156 was recovered from the possession of the petitioner/accused. The accused
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
