SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 389

NANDITA DUBEY
Pramod Kumar Lihkhar – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Manish Datt with Ambar Mishra for petitioner;
Sanjeev Singh, Panel Lawyer for respondent/State.

ORDER

1. Both these Criminal Revisions have been filed against the order(s) dated 02.12.2015, passed by Second Additional Sessions Judge, Dindori, framing charges under sections 467 read with 109, 420 read with 120-B, 468 read with 109, 471 read with 120-B, 409 read with 120-B and 201 of IPC against Pramod Kumar Lihkhar (petitioner in Cr.R. No.3250/2015) and under sections 467 read with 109, 420 read with 120-B, 468 read with 109, 471 read with 120-B and 409 read with 120-B of I.P.C. against Bhupendra Kumar Prabhat (petitioner in Cr.R. No.197/2016).

2. The brief facts of the case, as emerged from the material on record are that the First Information Report came to be registered on the basis of a written complaint dated 8.9.2005, filed by Pramod Kumar Lihkhar (petitioner in Cr.R. No.3250/2015), Branch Manager, Central Bank of India, Branch Ajwar, district Dindori, wherein it was disclosed that Ramanand Jha and Suresh Chourasiya, who had their accounts with the Central Bank of India, committed fraud by depositing fictitious cheques drawn on State Bank of India, Dindori Branch in their accounts and later on withdrew the money. After registration of the FIR, the investigating officer

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top