SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 385

MOHAMMAD RAFIQ, VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA
Saroj Dehariya – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Sankalp Kochar for petitioner; Ashish Anand Barnard, Deputy Advocate General for respondents No.1 and 2/State; Piyush Dharmadhikar for respondents No.3 and 4/High Court of M.P.

ORDER

Rafiq, C.J. -- 1. This writ petition filed by Saroj Dehariya seeks to challenge the final result of Civil Judge Class-II (Entry Level) Examination, 2018 declared bythe Registrar (Exam), High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur (respondent No.4) vide notification dated 21.8.2019 (Annexure-P/6) to the extent of non-selection and consequential denial of appointment to the petitioner on the post of Civil Judge Class-II (Entry Level) in the Physically Handicapped quota (Scheduled Caste category).

2. The facts of the case, in brief, are that the respondents No. 3 & 4 floated advertisement dated 17.12.2018 (Annexure-P/1) notifying total 190 posts for appointment of Civil Judge Class-II (Entry Level). The categorywise break-up of such posts is as follow:

(a)

Un-reserved (UR)

95

(b)

Other Backward Classes (OBC)

27

(c)

Scheduled Caste (SC)

30

(d)

Scheduled Tribe (ST)

38

 

Total

190

The advertisement stipulated that reservation of 6% shall be given to the Specially Abled candidates as per the provisions of section 34 of the Rights of Persons with

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top