SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 330

MOHAMMAD RAFIQ, VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA
Ankit Patel – Appellant
Versus
State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Ashish Rawat for appellant; Aashish Anand Barnard, Deputy Advocate General for respondents/State.

ORDER

Rafiq, C.J. -- 1. This appeal seeks to challenge the judgment passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P. No.2565/2020 dated 22.3.2021 by which the writ petition filed by the appellant has been dismissed.

2. The appellant in the writ petition challenged the order dated 11.10.2019 (Annexure P-4) wherein the Additional Regional Transport Officer, Chhindwara while granting discount of 40% i.e. Rs. 3,78,960/- out of the total demand of Rs. 9,47,400/- on the payable amount of motor vehicle tax and penalty in respect of the vehicle No. MP-28-P-0269 registered in the name of the petitioner had raised a demand of Rs. 5,68,440/-, calling upon the petitioner to pay the same up to the month of October, 2019.

3. Mr. Ashish Rawat, learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that as per the notification dated 2.8.2019 issued by the Transport Department, Government of Madhya Pradesh under section 21(1) of the Madhya Pradesh Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1991, the respondents were required to give discount/exemption to the extent of 90% on the payable amount of motor vehicle tax and penalt

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top