SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 351

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
G.S. Ahluwalia, J.
Shreeram Sharma v. The State of M.P.
Miscellaneou Petition No. 3423 of 2020 (G);
Decided on 23.2.2021

Advocates:
Neerendra Sharma for Petitioner; Deepak Khot, Government Advocate for respondent/State.

Headnote:

(1) Motor Vehicles Rules, 1994 (M.P.) -- Rr.77(1a) and 77(1b) -- Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 -- S.72 -- applicability of R.77(1a) -- by amendment dated 28th December, 2015 rule, 77(1a) would not be applicable to stage carriage which was registered before coming into force of amendment -- bus registered much prior to coming into force of amended Rules -- section 72 of Act does not authorize Regional Transport Authority to amend Rules -- Regional Transport Authority erred in deferring application for renewal of permit of bus -- impugned order quashed -- Regional Transport Authority directed to decide application for renewal of permit -- petition allowed with Cost. [Paras10, 13 & 17 to 19

(2) Constitution of India -- Arts. 215, 226 and 227 -- order passed by High Court is binding on all subordinate Courts and on all Tribunals functioning wiith in same State -- judgments passed by High Court cannot be refused to be relied upon on ground that they are not reported -- making distinction in unreported judgmnet and reported judgment of High Court is against judicial discipline. AIR 1962 SC 1893 followed. [Paras 14 to 16

¼1½ eksVj ;ku vfèkfu;e] 1994 ¼e-ç-½ && fu-77¼1d½ rFkk 77 ¼1[k½ && eksVj ;ku vf/kfu;e] 1988 && /kkjk 72 && fu-77¼1d½ dk ykxw gksuk && fnukad 28 fnlacj] 2015 ds la'kks/ku ls fu;e 77¼1d½ ,slh] eaftyh xkM+h ij ykxw ugha gksxk tks la'kks/ku izo`Ùk gksus ls iwoZ jftLVªhÑr Fkh && la'kks/ku fu;e izo`Ùk gksus ls cgqr igys cl jftLVªhÑr fu;e la'kks/ku djus ds fy, laHkkxh; ifjogu izkf/kdj.k dks vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 72 izkf/kÑr ugha djrh && cl ds vuqKki= ds uohdj.k ds fy, vkosnu vkLFkfxr djus esa laHkkxh; ifjogu izkf/kdj.k us xyrh dh && vk{ksfir vkns'k vfHk[kafMr && vuqKki= ds uohdj.k ds fy, vkosnu dk fofu'p; djus ds fy, laHkkxh; ifjogu izkf/kdj.k funsf'kr && ;kfpdk lO;; eatwjA ¼iSjk 10] 13 ,oa 17 ls 19
¼2½ Hkkjr dk lafo/kku && vuq- 215] 226 rFkk 227 && mPp U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vkns'k mlh jkT; esa dk;Zjr lHkh v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa ij rFkk lHkh vfèkdj.kksa ij vkc)dj gS &&mPp U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ;ksa dk voyac ysus ls bl vk/kkj ij bUdkj ugha fd;k tk ldrk fd og laizdkf'kr ugha gS && mPp U;k;ky; ds vlaizdkf'kr fu.kZ; rFkk laizdkf'kr fu.kZ; esa foHksn djuk U;kf;d vuq'kklu ds fo#) gSA , vkb vkj 1962 ,l lh 1893 vuqlfjrA ¼iSjk 14 ls 16

ORDER

1. This petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India has been filed against the order dated at 8.12.2020 passed by Shri Axay Kumar Dwivedi, STAT, Gwalior in Appeal No. 21/2020 whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner against the order dated 16.9.2020 has been dismissed and the application filed by the petitioner for renewal of permit in respect of bus No. M.P-33-E-0199 has been deferred on the ground that the said bus has completed its life of 15 years and, therefore, the petitioner should replace the bus as per the amendment in Rule 77 of (MP Motor Vehicles Rules, 1994).

2. It is submitted by the Counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was granted permit for plying bus No. M.P-33-E-0199. The last renewal of the permit was having its validity from 25.4.2015 to 25.4.2020. After the validity came to an end, he filed an application for renewal which has been deferred by RTA by the impugned order dated 16.9.2020 which has been affirmed by STAT. It is submitted that the co-ordinate bench of this Court by order dated 30.8.2018 passed in case of Waheed Khan v. Transport Department and Ors. [W.P. No. 7703/2018] has held that the provision of sub-rule (1a) of rule 77 of MP Motor Vehicles Rules, 1994 (In short Rules 1994) would not apply to the stage carriage which were registered earlier and accordingly, petitioner is entitled for renewal of his permit and deferment of his application is contrary to such judgment.

3. This Court, by orders dated 5.1. 2021, 12.1.2021, 18.1.2021, 29.1.2021 and 15.2.2021 granted time to the State Counsel to verify as to whether any writ appeal against the order passed in the case of Waheed Khan (supra), is under contemplation or not. It is submitted by the State Counsel that in spite of various letters sent by the Office of Additional Advocate General, no response has been received.

4. Under these circumstances, this Court is left with no other option, but to hear this case on merits.

5. It is the case of the petitioner that he was granted permit for the bus bearing registration no. M.P-33-E-0199 which was lastly renewed in the year 2015 and validity of renewed permit was upto 25.4.2020. It is further admitted by the Counsel for the petitioner that bus bearing registration No. M.P-33-E-0199 has attained its age of 15 years in the month of July 2020.

6. Now the only question for consideration is as to whether the case of the petitioner is covered by the amended provision of rule 77 (1a) of Rules, 1994 or not.

7. By amendment dated 24th of September, 2010 in the Rules of 1994, sub-rule (1a) was inserted in Rule 77 of Rule of 1994 which reads as under :-

“3. In rule 77, Sub-rule (1), the following subrule shall be inserted, namely :-

(1 a) In order to ensure safe, secure and convenient transport services to the passengers, the permit granting authority while granting a stage carriage permit shall abide the following conditions, namely :-

(i) that no stage carriage permit shall be granted on interstate route to a vehicle which has completed 10 years from the manufacture year;

(ii)that no stage carriage permit shall be granted for ordinary route within the State to a vehicle which has completed 15 years from the year of manufacture;

(iii)that no stage carriage permit shall be granted for any route to the vehicle which has completed 20 years from the year of manufacture;

(iv)that for long distance route of 150 km or above in a single trip, the following category of vehicles with seating capacity shown against each shall be permitted to ply :

1    Deluxe/Air Conditioned bus

not less than 35+2 seats, excluding driver and conductor

2    Express bus not less than

45+2 seats, excluding driver and conductor

3    Ordinary bus not less than

50+2 seats, excluding driver and conductor

8. Rules 77 (1a) (ii) which provided that no stage carriage permit shall

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top