SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 345

VISHAL MISHRA
Rahul Singhal – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
N.K. Gupta with Shailendra Gupta for petitioner; A.K. Nirankari, Government Advocate for respondent/State

ORDER

1. The present petition is being filed by the petitioner seeking following reliefs :

“(I) That, the respondents authorities be directed not to compel the petitioner to replace the vehicle for plying on the route Pathari to Kurwai via Chhapra, Godavari, Bamora as the provisions of amended Rules i.e. 24.10.2011 sub-rule (1-a) will not apply to the petitioner as the same came into force subsequent to the registration of the petitioner’s vehicle and same has no application in view of the provisions of rule 77 (1-b).

(II) That, the relief as granted by this Hon’ble Court in Writ Petition No.7703/2018 may kindly be granted in favour of the petitioner.

(III) Any other writ, order or direction as this Hon’ble Court may deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case be granted to the petitioner against the respondents. Costs be awarded.”

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the registered owner of the vehicle bearing Registration No.MP08-E- 0180, 2005 model having seating capacity 30+2 and plying the vehicle, permit has been granted by th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top