SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 357

RAJEEV KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA
Malkhan Prajapati – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Tapendra Sharma for applicant; Nitin Goyal, Panel Lawyer for respondent/State.

ORDER

1. This petition is preferred under section 482 of CrPC arising out of the order dated 28.11.2020 passed by Second Additional Sessions Judge, Karera, District Shivpuri in Criminal Revision No. 73/2020, confirming the order dated 9.9.2020 passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC), Karea District Shivpuri in Case No.MJCR/63/2020, whereby the application filed by the petitioner under section 457 of CrPC for releasing the vehicle, has been rejected.

2. The facts, in nutshell, are that one case was registered against the present petitioner under section 379 of IPC and sections 4(1) and 21(1) of Mines and Minerals Act and vehicle bearing registration No. MP33-HA-3600 has been seized. The revision preferred against the order dated 28.11.2020 passed by JMFC Karera District Shivpuri has been rejected by order dated 9.9.2020 in Criminal Revision No. 73/2020.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that no prima facie case is made out. The petitioner is a registered owner of the vehicle in question and having all the relevant documents of the seized vehicle including permit of mining issued by the Director of Geology and Mining, Uttar Pradesh for inter-state transit p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top