Back
RAJEEV KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA
Kasturchand Jain (since deceased) through LRs. Smt. Kamla Jain – Appellant
Versus
Laxmi Narayan Sharma – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. This second appeal has been filed under section 100 of CPC against the impugned judgment and decree dated 31.1.2012 passed by Additional Judge to Second Additional District Judge Basoda (Fast Track Court), District Vidisha, in First Appeal No.61A/2011, confirming and modifying the judgment and decree dated 8.9.2010 passed by Civil Judge Class-1, Vidisha in Civil Suit No. 7A/2010.
2. This second appeal was admitted for hearing vide order dated 21.10.2013 on the following substantial questions of law :-
“1. Whether, both the Courts below have committed an illegality having not granted the decree under section 12(1) (e) of the Accommodation Control Act while recording the finding which suffers from perversity of approach ?
2. Whether, the lower appellate Court has committed an illegality while setting aside the judgment and decree under ection 12 (1)(a) despite recording a positive finding with respect to nonentitlement of the defendant to get benefit under Section 12(3) of the Act ?”
3. The facts of the case in brief are that deceased plaintiff-Kasturchand Jain instituted a civil suit under section 12(1)(a) and 12(1)(e) of the MP Accommodation Control Act, 1961 (for br
The bona fide requirement for eviction under the M.P. Accommodation Control Act is a factual matter that courts should respect unless clear errors are demonstrated.
The bona fide need of a landlord under the M.P. Accommodation Control Act includes the needs of their spouse, and heirs can execute eviction decrees despite the original landlord's death.
Control of Eviction of Tenants - Restriction on eviction of tenants - Bonafide - First appellate Court is absolutely unjustified in setting aside decree of eviction granted by trial Court under Secti....
The court reaffirmed that bona fide need for premises may justify eviction, especially when tenant fails to pay rent and alternative accommodations are unavailable.
The genuine need of the landlord for the premises and the default in rent payment by the tenant are crucial factors in eviction cases.
The requirement of substantial questions of law and the impact of new tenancy acts on ongoing proceedings must be carefully considered by the court.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
