SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 476

RAJEEV KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA
Kasturchand Jain (since deceased) through LRs. Smt. Kamla Jain – Appellant
Versus
Laxmi Narayan Sharma – Respondent


Advocates:
Amit Lahoti for appellants; Sanjay Mishra for respondent.

JUDGMENT

1. This second appeal has been filed under section 100 of CPC against the impugned judgment and decree dated 31.1.2012 passed by Additional Judge to Second Additional District Judge Basoda (Fast Track Court), District Vidisha, in First Appeal No.61A/2011, confirming and modifying the judgment and decree dated 8.9.2010 passed by Civil Judge Class-1, Vidisha in Civil Suit No. 7A/2010.

2. This second appeal was admitted for hearing vide order dated 21.10.2013 on the following substantial questions of law :-

“1. Whether, both the Courts below have committed an illegality having not granted the decree under section 12(1) (e) of the Accommodation Control Act while recording the finding which suffers from perversity of approach ?

2. Whether, the lower appellate Court has committed an illegality while setting aside the judgment and decree under ection 12 (1)(a) despite recording a positive finding with respect to nonentitlement of the defendant to get benefit under Section 12(3) of the Act ?”

3. The facts of the case in brief are that deceased plaintiff-Kasturchand Jain instituted a civil suit under section 12(1)(a) and 12(1)(e) of the MP Accommodation Control Act, 1961 (for br

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top